HueApplication · Cloudera

CVE-2016-4946

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-03-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.9.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cloudera HUE 3.9.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) First name or (2) Last name field in the HUE Users page.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stored XSS vulnerability in Cloudera HUE 3.9.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML through the First name and Last name fields on the HUE Users page. When other users view the user profile, the malicious payload executes in their browser session.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding on the First name and Last name fields in the HUE user management interface, or upgrade to a patched version of HUE that addresses this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HueApplication
Affected:<= 3.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed HUE version
    Locate the HUE version information through the HUE web interface (typically in Help > About) or by checking the version of the hue package installed on the system using the package manager or hue version command
    Affected if The installed version is Cloudera HUE 3.9.0 or any version earlier than 3.9.0
  2. Verify access to the HUE user management interface
    Log into HUE and navigate to the Users administration page (typically accessible via Administration > Users or the Users icon in the navigation bar)
    Affected if The user management interface is accessible and users can be created or edited
  3. Confirm user profile viewing is enabled
    Check if HUE allows users to view other user profiles by accessing a user profile page (typically /hue/useradmin/users/<user_id>/) while logged in as a different user
    Affected if User profiles are viewable by other authenticated users in the system
  4. Check if First name and Last name fields accept input without validation
    Attempt to create or edit a user through the HUE user management interface and observe if the First name and Last name fields accept special characters (<, >, ', ", script tags) without immediate rejection or sanitization
    Affected if The First name and Last name fields accept and store HTML or JavaScript special characters without sanitization, and these values are reflected when other users view the profile

A user is affected if they are running Cloudera HUE version 3.9.0 or earlier and the HUE user management interface is accessible, allowing stored XSS payloads in First name/Last name fields to execute when other users view those profiles.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.9.0
Interim mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding on the First name and Last name fields in the HUE user management interface, or upgrade to a patched version of HUE that addresses this vulnerability.

Fix this in Hue Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4946 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data