CVE-2016-5022
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedF5 BIG-IP LTM, Analytics, APM, ASM, and Link Controller 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP AAM, AFM, and PEM 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP DNS 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16 and 11.3.0; BIG-IP GTM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1; BIG-IP PSM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, and 11.4.0 through 11.4.1; Enterprise Manager 3.1.1; BIG-IQ Cloud and Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Centralized Management 5.0.0; BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0; and iWorkflow 2.0.0, when Packet Filtering is enabled on virtual servers and possibly self IP addresses, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Traffic Management Microkernel restart) and possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted network traffic.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceF5 BIG-IP products contain a vulnerability when Packet Filtering is enabled on virtual servers or self IP addresses. Remote attackers can send crafted network traffic to cause a Denial of Service by forcing the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to restart, and potentially achieve unspecified additional impacts. The CVSS 9.8 indicates network-exploitable, low-complexity attacks requiring no authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 11.4.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 12.0.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1= 4.0.0= 4.1.0= 4.2.0= 4.3.0= 4.4.0= 4.5.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 4.5.0= 11.2.0= 11.2.1= 11.3.0= 11.4.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.0= 11.5.1= 11.5.2= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 11.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP product and versionRun `tmsh show /sys version` or check the web UI under System > Software > Image to determine the exact product module and version numberAffected if The version matches one of the affected versions listed in the CVE (e.g., 11.2.0, 11.5.0, 12.0.0, 4.0.0, etc.) for any of the affected modules (Link Controller, APM, GTM, ASM, PEM, WebAccelerator, BigIq Cloud, BigIq ADC)
-
Verify whether Packet Filtering is enabled on any self IP addressesRun `tmsh list /net self all` and look for the `packet-filtering` option in each self IP configuration, or check via the web UI under Network > Self IPs > select each self IP > examine the Packet Filtering settingAffected if Any self IP address has Packet Filtering enabled
You are affected only if you are running one of the listed product versions AND have Packet Filtering enabled on at least one virtual server or self IP address, as the vulnerability requires both conditions to be present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant F5 hotfixes (11.2.x HF16, 11.5.x HF2, 11.6.x HF1, 12.x HF3) or upgrade to supported versions. Alternatively, disable Packet Filtering on affected virtual servers and self IP addresses if immediate patching is not feasible.
F5 BIG-IP/BIG-IQ: Apply the version-specific hotfix (11.2.1 HF16, 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.1 HF1, or 12.0.0 HF3 depending on your product line and base version)
- 1. Identify the exact BIG-IP or BIG-IQ product version currently installed using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web UI.
- 2. Determine which product line and version family applies (LTM/ASM/APM/Link Controller/GTM/etc.).
- 3. Download and apply the appropriate F5 hotfix as specified in the official description: for 11.2.x apply 11.2.1 HF16; for 11.3.x/11.4.x apply 11.5.4 HF2; for 11.5.x apply 11.5.4 HF2; for 11.6.x apply 11.6.1 HF1; for 12.x apply 12.0.0 HF3.
- 4. For BIG-IQ devices: apply the corresponding hotfix for versions 4.0.0-4.5.0 as listed in F5 K88162175.
- 5. After applying the hotfix, verify the fix by checking 'tmsh show sys version' confirms the new HF version is installed.
- 6. Test packet filtering functionality to ensure normal operations resume.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5022 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data