CVE-2016-5023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVirtual servers in F5 BIG-IP systems 11.2.1 HF11 through HF15, 11.4.1 HF4 through HF10, 11.5.3 through 11.5.4, 11.6.0 HF5 through HF7, and 12.0.0, when configured with a TCP profile, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Traffic Management Microkernel restart) via crafted network traffic.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVirtual servers in F5 BIG-IP systems running specific hotfix versions (11.2.1 HF11-HF15, 11.4.1 HF4-HF10, 11.5.3-11.5.4, 11.6.0 HF5-HF7, and 12.0.0) configured with a TCP profile are vulnerable to remote denial-of-service attacks via crafted network traffic that triggers a Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.2.1= 11.2.1= 11.4.1= 11.2.1= 11.4.1= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 12.0.0= 11.2.1= 11.4.1= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 12.0.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 12.0.0= 12.0.0= 11.4.1= 11.5.3= 11.5.4= 11.6.0= 12.0.0= 11.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP product versionRun the command 'tmsh show sys version' or check the GUI under System > Software > Image List to determine the exact version and hotfix level of the F5 BIG-IP systemAffected if The version matches any of the affected ranges: 11.2.1 HF11-HF15, 11.4.1 HF4-HF10, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.6.0 HF5-HF7, or 12.0.0
-
Verify the BIG-IP product moduleConfirm which F5 module is running (Analytics, ASM, AFM, DNS, PEM, WAN Optimization, or Edge Gateway) by checking the licensed modules under System > License or via 'tmsh show sys license'Affected if The system is running any of the affected products: Big Ip Edge Gateway, Protocol Security Module, Analytics, Application Security Manager, Advanced Firewall Manager, Domain Name System, Policy Enforcement Manager, or Wan Optimization Manager
-
Identify virtual servers with TCP profiles configuredReview virtual server configurations via the GUI under Local Traffic > Virtual Servers or run 'tmsh list ltm virtual' to list all virtual servers and their associated TCP profilesAffected if Any virtual server is configured with a TCP profile (such as the default 'tcp' profile or a custom TCP profile)
-
Confirm the hotfix level for affected base versionsCheck the detailed hotfix version by running 'tmsh show sys version' or examining the software image filename, as the vulnerability applies only to specific hotfix ranges within the base versions listedAffected if Running a hotfix within the vulnerable ranges (11.2.1 HF11-HF15, 11.4.1 HF4-HF10, or 11.6.0 HF5-HF7)
The system is affected if it runs any of the listed F5 BIG-IP product versions with a virtual server configured using a TCP profile.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a patched version as specified in the F5 security advisory for this vulnerability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data