CVE-2016-5262
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla Firefox before 48.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.3 process JavaScript event-handler attributes of a MARQUEE element within a sandboxed IFRAME element that lacks the sandbox="allow-scripts" attribute value, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted web site.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMozilla Firefox before 48.0 and Firefox ESR 45.x before 45.3 contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability where JavaScript event-handler attributes of a MARQUEE element can execute within a sandboxed IFRAME element that lacks the sandbox="allow-scripts" attribute. This allows attackers to bypass the intended sandbox restrictions and inject malicious scripts via crafted webpages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 47.0.1= 45.1.0= 45.1.1= 45.2.0= 45.3.0= 5.0= 6= 7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, go to Help > About Firefox (or navigate to about:support), or run 'firefox --version' from command lineAffected if Version is 47.0.1 or lower, or is 45.1.0, 45.1.1, 45.2.0, or 45.3.0 (ESR 45.x before 45.3)
-
Check for ESR version specificallyIn about:support, look for 'Version' field - ESR versions include 'ESR' in the version string (e.g., 45.3 (ESR)')Affected if Running Firefox ESR 45.x where x is less than 3 (45.0, 45.1, 45.2)
-
Audit web pages for sandboxed IFRAME usageSearch web application source code for '<iframe' elements containing 'sandbox' attribute, then check if 'allow-scripts' is absent from the sandbox valueAffected if Sandboxed iframes exist without the 'allow-scripts' directive present
-
Search for MARQUEE element usage in web contentInspect web application HTML for <marquee> tags, especially within IFRAME contexts or user-generated content areasAffected if MARQUEE elements with event-handler attributes (onstart, onfinish, onbounce, etc.) exist in content loaded within sandboxed iframes
You are affected if running Firefox 47.0.1 or earlier, or Firefox ESR 45.2 or earlier, and your web content contains MARQUEE elements with JavaScript event handlers inside sandboxed iframes that lack the allow-scripts attribute.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Firefox to version 48.0 or later (or ESR 45.3 or later) to apply the vendor patch. As a compensating control, implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict inline script execution.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5262 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5262 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data