CVE-2016-5302
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCitrix XenServer 7.0 before Hotfix XS70E003, when a deployment has been upgraded from an earlier release, might allow remote attackers on the management network to "compromise" a host by leveraging credentials for an Active Directory account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCitrix XenServer 7.0 contains a vulnerability in upgraded deployments where Active Directory credentials are improperly retained or handled after the upgrade process. Remote attackers on the management network can exploit these AD credential handling flaws to compromise the XenServer host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify XenServer versionRun 'xe host-list' or check /etc/centos-release to confirm the installed XenServer version is 7.0 or belowAffected if Version is 7.0 or lower (e.g., 6.5, 6.2, etc.)
-
Determine if installation was an upgradeReview the XenServer installation history: check /var/log/installer.log or the output of 'xe host-software-version' for evidence of upgrade versus fresh installation. Also check if previous patch levels from older versions are present in 'xe patch-list'.Affected if The system was upgraded from an earlier XenServer version (e.g., 6.5 or older) rather than being a fresh 7.0 installation
-
Verify Active Directory integration is configuredRun 'xe domain-list' or check AD-related configuration files in /etc/sssd/ and /opt/xensource/libexec/ss- from the host. Use 'net ads info' if kerberos tools are installed to confirm AD domain membership.Affected if The XenServer host is joined to an Active Directory domain or has AD authentication configured
-
Check management network accessibilityReview network configuration: run 'xe network-list' and inspect the management interface via 'xe host-management-reconfigure' or check /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ for the management network interface. Confirm whether the management network is exposed to untrusted segments.Affected if The management interface is accessible from network segments accessible to remote attackers (not isolated)
A user is affected if their XenServer 7.0 (or lower) was upgraded from an earlier version, has Active Directory integration configured, and the management network is accessible to potential remote attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Hotfix XS70E003 to XenServer 7.0 installations that were upgraded from earlier releases. Alternatively, perform a fresh installation rather than an upgrade to avoid inheriting the vulnerable credential configuration.
- Identify the current XenServer version using `xe host-list` or the XenCenter console
- Verify the deployment was upgraded from an earlier release (this vulnerability specifically affects upgraded deployments)
- Download Hotfix XS70E003 from the Citrix support portal (support.citrix.com)
- Apply the hotfix according to Citrix's standard hotfix installation procedure, typically using `xe patch-upload` and `xe patch-apply` commands
- Restart affected hosts as recommended by the hotfix documentation
- Verify the hotfix has been applied successfully
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5302 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data