CVE-2016-5756
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple components of the web tools in NetIQ Access Manager 4.1 before 4.1.2 Hot Fix 1 and 4.2 before 4.2.2 were vulnerable to Reflected Cross Site Scripting attacks which could be used to hijack user sessions: nps/servlet/frameservice, nps/servlet/webacc, roma/admin/cntl, roma/jsp/admin/appliance/devicedetail_edit.jsp, roma/jsp/admin/managementip/mgmt_ip_details_frameset.jsp, roma/jsp/admin/managementip/mgmt_ip_details_middleframe.jsp, roma/jsp/volsc/monitoring/appliance.jsp, and roma/jsp/volsc/monitoring/graph.jsp.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in multiple web tool components of NetIQ Access Manager 4.1 and 4.2. Eight endpoints including servlets and JSP files (nps/servlet/frameservice, nps/servlet/webacc, roma/admin/cntl, and multiple monitoring/administration JSP pages) fail to properly sanitize user input in URL parameters, allowing injection of malicious scripts that execute in the context of the victim's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.1= 4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetIQ Access Manager installationSearch for NetIQ Access Manager installation directories (commonly /opt/novell/nam/ or check for 'NetIQ' or 'Access Manager' in installed software listings). Check for the 'nps' and 'roma' web application directories.Affected if NetIQ Access Manager is installed and the web components (nps, roma) are present
-
Verify installed version is 4.1 or 4.2Locate version information in the Access Manager installation - typically in configuration files, About pages, or the admin console. Look for version files in the installation directory or access the admin interface version display.Affected if Installed version equals 4.1 or equals 4.2 exactly (version must be exactly 4.1 or exactly 4.2)
-
Confirm web administration interfaces are exposedTest if the vulnerable endpoints are accessible on the server: attempt to reach /nps/servlet/frameservice, /nps/servlet/webacc, and /roma/admin/cntl paths via HTTP/HTTPS from the server itself or check if these URL paths are published in the web server configuration.Affected if Any of the endpoints (nps/servlet/frameservice, nps/servlet/webacc, roma/admin/cntl) are accessible via network
-
Check monitoring/administration JSP pages accessibilityIdentify and probe for the multiple monitoring and administration JSP pages mentioned in the affected components. These are typically under the /nps/ or /roma/ web contexts. Verify if these pages accept URL parameters without obvious sanitization.Affected if Monitoring or administration JSP pages accept user-supplied URL parameters and are accessible without authentication or with session-based authentication
You are affected if NetIQ Access Manager version 4.1 or 4.2 is installed AND any of the vulnerable web endpoints (nps/servlet/frameservice, nps/servlet/webacc, roma/admin/cntl, or monitoring/admin JSP pages) are network-accessible and accept unsanitized URL parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches (4.1.2 Hot Fix 1 for 4.1.x or 4.2.2 for 4.2.x) to address the XSS vulnerability in all affected endpoints. As interim mitigation, implement input validation at a WAF or restrict access to vulnerable endpoints until patching is complete.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5756 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5756 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data