LibicalApplication · Libical Project

CVE-2016-5827

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-01-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The icaltime_from_string function in libical 0.47 and 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds heap read) via a crafted string to the icalparser_parse_string function.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A heap-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in libical versions 0.47 and 1.0. The icaltime_from_string function does not properly validate input when parsing a crafted string through icalparser_parse_string, allowing an attacker to trigger an out-of-bounds heap read leading to denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade libical to the latest version to obtain the security patch. If immediate patching is not possible, sanitize and validate all iCal input strings before passing them to icalparser_parse_string.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibicalApplication
Affected:= 0.47= 1.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if libical library is installed
    Run 'pkg-config --modversion libical' or check your package manager for installed libical packages (dpkg -l | grep libical, rpm -qa | grep libical)
    Affected if libical is not installed or the package is not found - you are not affected; if installed, continue to version check
  2. Determine the installed libical version
    Run 'pkg-config --modversion libical' or check the output from your package manager command above; also check for libical.so in /usr/lib/ and run 'strings /usr/lib/libical.so | grep -i version' if needed
    Affected if Version is 0.47 or 1.0.0 - you are directly affected by this CVE
  3. Verify if applications link against the vulnerable libical library
    Run 'ldd /path/to/your/application | grep libical' for any binaries or services that use libical, or check application dependencies
    Affected if Any application dynamically links to libical version 0.47 or 1.0.0 - the vulnerability is present in your runtime environment
  4. Check if icalparser_parse_string processes external input
    Review application source code or configuration for calls to icalparser_parse_string with data from untrusted sources (user input, network, files from external parties)
    Affected if Your application calls icalparser_parse_string with untrusted iCal strings - the vulnerable code path is reachable and could be exploited

You are affected if libical version 0.47 or 1.0.0 is installed AND any application uses icalparser_parse_string to process external or untrusted iCal data, allowing a crafted string to trigger the out-of-bounds heap read in icaltime_from_string.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade libical to the latest version to obtain the security patch. If immediate patching is not possible, sanitize and validate all iCal input strings before passing them to icalparser_parse_string.

Fix this in Libical Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-5827 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-5827 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data