Sterling Secure ProxyApplication · Ibm

CVE-2016-6025

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-10-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
64/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 allows remote attackers to obtain access by leveraging an unattended workstation to conduct a post-logoff session-reuse attack involving a modified URL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy fails to properly invalidate user sessions after logout. An attacker with physical access to an unattended workstation can use a modified URL to reuse a still-active session and gain unauthorized access to the application after the legitimate user has logged off.

MitigationApply IBM iFix 8 for version 3.4.2 or iFix 1 for version 3.4.3 as specified by IBM. Additionally, enforce workstation auto-lock policies and instruct users to explicitly close browsers after logout to mitigate the physical access attack vector.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sterling Secure ProxyApplication
Affected:= 3.4.2.0= 3.4.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM Sterling Secure Proxy version
    Run 'java -version' or check the product's about/version information panel in the Configuration Manager GUI, or inspect the installation directory for version files. Typical path: <install_dir>/bin/version.sh or check the installedPackages file in the configuration directory.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.4.2.0 or exactly 3.4.3.0
  2. Confirm Configuration Manager component is deployed
    Verify the IBM Sterling Secure Proxy Configuration Manager web application is accessible. Check if the '/ConfigManager' or similar admin endpoint is exposed and operational on the affected host.
    Affected if Configuration Manager web interface is accessible and the product version is 3.4.2.0 or 3.4.3.0
  3. Test session invalidation behavior
    Log into Configuration Manager, note the session identifier or cookie, then log out. Attempt to access a protected page using the original session URL or cookies without re-authenticating.
    Affected if After clicking logout, the prior session URL or cookies still grant access to authenticated functions without requiring new credentials
  4. Check IBM fix level
    Review installed iFixes by running 'lslpp -l' on AIX, 'rpm -qa' on Linux, or checking the fix history in the Configuration Manager under System Administration > Maintenance. Look for iFix 8 for v3.4.2 or iFix 1 for v3.4.3.
    Affected if The system is at version 3.4.2.0 or 3.4.3.0 with no corresponding iFix installed

A user is affected if their IBM Sterling Secure Proxy version is exactly 3.4.2.0 or 3.4.3.0 AND the Configuration Manager is in use AND sessions remain valid after logout without the corresponding IBM iFix applied.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM iFix 8 for version 3.4.2 or iFix 1 for version 3.4.3 as specified by IBM. Additionally, enforce workstation auto-lock policies and instruct users to explicitly close browsers after logout to mitigate the physical access attack vector.

Fix this in Sterling Secure Proxy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6025 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6025 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data