CVE-2016-6184
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Camera driver in Huawei Honor 4C smartphones with software CHM-UL00C00 before CHM-UL00C00B564, CHM-TL00C01 before CHM-TL00C01B564, and CHM-TL00C00 before CHM-TL00HC00B564 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or gain privileges via a crafted application, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-6180, CVE-2016-6181, CVE-2016-6182, and CVE-2016-6183.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the camera driver of Huawei Honor 4C smartphones (models CHM-UL00C00, CHM-TL00C01, CHM-TL00C00) allows a malicious application to trigger either a system crash (denial of service) or elevate privileges. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation or permission handling within the camera driver component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= chm-tl00c01_b535= chm-tl00c01b556= chm-tl00hc00_b535= chm-tl00hc00b556= chm-ul00c00b535= chm-ul00c00b556CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck the device settings or system information to confirm the model number is one of: CHM-UL00C00, CHM-TL00C01, or CHM-TL00C00Affected if Device model is not one of these three specific Honor 4C variants, the device is not affected
-
Check firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version on the Huawei Honor 4C device and note the build number or firmware version stringAffected if Firmware version exactly matches one of: chm-tl00c01_b535, chm-tl00c01b556, chm-tl00hc00_b535, chm-tl00hc00b556, chm-ul00c00b535, or chm-ul00c00b556
-
Confirm camera driver presenceVerify the camera application and camera driver module are present on the device by checking the camera app in the application manager or system logsAffected if Camera driver is installed and functional - the vulnerability requires the camera driver to be present for exploitation
The device is affected only if it is a Huawei Honor 4C (CHM-UL00C00, CHM-TL00C01, or CHM-TL00C00) running one of the six specific vulnerable firmware versions listed, and the camera driver component is present on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the device firmware to version CHM-UL00C00B564 or later for CHM-UL00C00, CHM-TL00C01B564 or later for CHM-TL00C01, and CHM-TL00HC00B564 or later for CHM-TL00C00. If updates are unavailable, restrict application installation to trusted sources and consider device replacement.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6184 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6184 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data