ResteasyApplication · Redhat

CVE-2016-6347

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-04-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default exception handler in RESTEasy allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in RESTEasy's default exception handler allows attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or script into web responses via unsanitized exception output. The default exception handler fails to properly encode or validate exception messages before rendering them in HTTP responses.

MitigationConfigure RESTEasy to use a secure exception handler that properly encodes output, or implement custom exception mappers that sanitize all exception data before rendering. Input validation and output encoding should be applied to all user-controlled data in exception responses.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ResteasyApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RESTEasy dependency
    Search your project's dependency files (pom.xml, build.gradle, package.json) and runtime classpath for resteasy-core, jboss resteasy, or org.jboss.resteasy libraries
    Affected if RESTEasy dependencies are present in the project
  2. Determine RESTEasy version
    Check the exact version of RESTEasy library in your dependency management (Maven, Gradle, or the JAR manifest files in /WEB-INF/lib)
    Affected if Any version of Red Hat RESTEasy is in use (the vulnerability affects all versions)
  3. Check for custom ExceptionMapper
    Search source code for classes implementing javax.ws.rs.ext.ExceptionMapper interface, particularly ExceptionMapper<Exception> or ExceptionMapper<Throwable>
    Affected if No custom ExceptionMapper implementation exists - the application relies on RESTEasy's default exception handler
  4. Verify exception handling configuration
    Review web.xml and RESTEasy configuration files for <resteasy-servlet> or ResourceScanner setup, and check if custom exception providers are registered in Application class
    Affected if No custom exception provider is registered and the default RESTEasy servlet handles exceptions
  5. Test exception output encoding
    Trigger an unhandled exception in a REST endpoint (e.g., by causing a null pointer or runtime exception) and inspect the HTTP response body for raw exception message text that could contain script tags
    Affected if Exception messages appear unencoded/escaped in the response (visible <, >, or script keywords without encoding)

Your environment is affected if Red Hat RESTEasy is in use AND no custom ExceptionMapper has been implemented to sanitize exception output before rendering.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Configure RESTEasy to use a secure exception handler that properly encodes output, or implement custom exception mappers that sanitize all exception data before rendering. Input validation and output encoding should be applied to all user-controlled data in exception responses.

Fix this in Resteasy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6347 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6347 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data