CVE-2016-6382
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS 15.2 through 15.6 and IOS XE 3.6 through 3.17 and 16.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart) via a malformed IPv6 Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) register packet, aka Bug ID CSCuy16399.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS and IOS XE allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending malformed IPv6 Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) register packets. The malformed packet triggers a device restart, as the affected software versions (IOS 15.2-15.6 and IOS XE 3.6-3.17/16.1) fail to properly validate the IPv6 PIM packet structure before processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.2\(1\)sy= 15.2\(1\)sy0a= 15.2\(1\)sy1= 15.2\(1\)sy1a= 15.2\(2\)e= 15.2\(2\)e1= 15.2\(2\)e2= 15.2\(2\)e4= 15.2\(2\)ea1= 15.2\(2\)ea2= 15.2\(2\)ea3= 15.2\(2\)eb= 3.6.0e= 3.6.1e= 3.6.2ae= 3.6.2e= 3.6.3e= 3.6.4e= 3.7.0e= 3.7.1e= 3.7.2e= 3.7.3e= 3.8.0e= 3.8.1eCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS or IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the version string in the output (e.g., 'Version 15.2(2)E4' or 'Version 16.1(1)T').Affected if The version matches or falls within the affected ranges: Cisco iOS 15.2(1)sy through 15.2(2)eb, or Cisco IOS XE 3.6.0e through 3.8.1e.
-
Confirm IPv6 is enabled on the deviceExecute 'show ipv6 interface brief' or 'show running-config | include ipv6' to see if IPv6 is configured.Affected if IPv6 is enabled and the device is running a vulnerable IOS/IOS XE version.
-
Check if IPv6 PIM is configuredExecute 'show ipv6 pim interface' or examine the running configuration for 'ipv6 pim' commands.Affected if IPv6 Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) is enabled on any interface and the device runs a vulnerable version.
-
Verify IPv6 PIM register processingExecute 'show ipv6 pim neighbor' or 'show ipv6 pim interface' to confirm active PIM adjacencies that could receive register packets.Affected if The device has IPv6 PIM neighbors or interfaces with PIM enabled, placing it at risk when receiving malformed IPv6 PIM register packets.
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Cisco IOS 15.2-15.6 or IOS XE 3.6-3.18/16.1 version AND has IPv6 PIM enabled, allowing malformed IPv6 PIM register packets to trigger a restart.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Cisco security patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider filtering or blocking untrusted IPv6 PIM traffic at network boundaries until the update can be deployed.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6382 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6382 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data