Firesight System SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2016-6471

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-12-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center running FireSIGHT System software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view the Remote Storage Password. More Information: CSCvb19366. Known Affected Releases: 5.4.1.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco Firepower Management Center web-based management interface contains an information disclosure vulnerability allowing authenticated remote attackers to view the Remote Storage Password. The attacker needs valid credentials to access the web interface, but can then view stored sensitive credentials they should not have access to.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability (contact Cisco for updated releases beyond 5.4.1.6). If patching is immediately unavailable, restrict web management interface access to trusted admin networks only and enforce strong authentication for all accounts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Firesight System SoftwareApplication
Affected:= 5.4.1.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Firepower Management Center version
    Log into the management console or run 'show version' via CLI to determine the Cisco Firesight/Firepower System Software version
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.4.1.6
  2. Confirm the web management interface is accessible
    Verify the FTD/Firepower web-based management interface is enabled and reachable at the management center URL
    Affected if The web interface is accessible to the user (even with valid admin credentials, this is the attack vector)
  3. Check if Remote Storage feature is configured
    Navigate to System > Integration > Remote Storage in the web interface, or inspect the configuration for any configured remote storage endpoints
    Affected if Remote Storage is configured and a password is stored in the system
  4. Verify user has web interface access
    Confirm you have valid administrative credentials for the Firepower Management Center web interface
    Affected if You can authenticate to the web management interface - the vulnerability allows any authenticated user to view the Remote Storage Password they should not have access to

You are affected if your installed Cisco Firesight/Firepower System Software is version 5.4.1.6, the web management interface is accessible, and Remote Storage is configured with stored credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability (contact Cisco for updated releases beyond 5.4.1.6). If patching is immediately unavailable, restrict web management interface access to trusted admin networks only and enforce strong authentication for all accounts.

Fix this in Firesight System Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6471 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6471 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data