CVE-2016-6493
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCitrix XenApp 6.x before 6.5 HRP07 and 7.x before 7.9 and Citrix XenDesktop before 7.9 might allow attackers to weaken an unspecified security mitigation via vectors related to memory permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a memory permission vulnerability in Citrix XenApp 6.x before 6.5 HRP07, XenApp 7.x before 7.9, and XenDesktop before 7.9 that allows attackers to weaken an unspecified security mitigation mechanism. The vulnerability involves vectors related to memory permission settings, potentially undermining memory protection features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0.0.0= 6.5.0.0= 7.0.0.0= 7.1.0.0= 7.5.0.0= 7.6.0.0= 7.7.0.0= 7.8.0.0<= 7.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Citrix XenApp versionOpen Windows Registry and navigate to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Citrix\XenApp\Version or run 'wmic product where "name like '%XenApp%'" get version' in Command PromptAffected if The reported version is 6.0.0.0, 6.5.0.0, 7.0.0.0, 7.1.0.0, 7.5.0.0, 7.6.0.0, 7.7.0.0, or 7.8.0.0, or any version below 6.5 HRP07 for XenApp 6.x or below 7.9 for XenApp 7.x
-
Identify installed Citrix XenDesktop versionOpen Windows Registry and navigate to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Citrix\XenDesktop\Version or run 'wmic product where "name like '%XenDesktop%'" get version' in Command PromptAffected if The reported version is 7.8 or any version lower than 7.9
-
Confirm product is actively runningCheck if the Citrix XenApp or XenDesktop service is running by opening Services.msc and looking for 'Citrix' services, or run 'sc query' for Citrix-related servicesAffected if Any Citrix XenApp version below 6.5 HRP07 (for 6.x) or below 7.9 (for 7.x), or XenDesktop below 7.9, is actively running on the system
-
Check product build details via PowerShellRun 'Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product | Where-Object {$_.Name -match "Citrix"} | Select-Object Name, Version' in PowerShell to list all Citrix componentsAffected if Any installed Citrix component matches the affected version ranges listed above
A system is affected if Citrix XenApp version 6.x is below 6.5 HRP07, XenApp 7.x is below 7.9, or XenDesktop is below 7.9, and the product is installed and running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Citrix XenApp to version 6.5 HRP07 or 7.9 (and XenDesktop to 7.9) or later to obtain the security patches that address this memory permission weakness.
XenApp 6.5 HRP07; XenApp 7.9; XenDesktop 7.9
- For XenApp 6.x deployments: Upgrade to XenApp 6.5 with Hotfix Rollup Pack 7 (HRP07) or later
- For XenApp 7.x deployments (7.0 through 7.8): Upgrade to XenApp 7.9 or later
- For XenDesktop deployments (all versions through 7.8): Upgrade to XenDesktop 7.9 or later
- After upgrading, verify the security mitigation is properly applied by reviewing Citrix documentation for the memory protection features in the fixed versions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6493 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6493 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data