CVE-2016-6558
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command injection vulnerability exists in apply.cgi on the ASUS RP-AC52 access point, firmware version 1.0.1.1s and possibly earlier, web interface specifically in the action_script parameter. The action_script parameter specifies a script to be executed if the action_mode parameter does not contain a valid state. If the input provided by action_script does not match one of the hard coded options, then it will be executed as the argument of either a system() or an eval() call allowing arbitrary commands to be executed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in ASUS RP-AC52 wireless access point firmware (version 1.0.1.1s and earlier). The apply.cgi script improperly handles the action_script parameter - when the action_mode parameter does not contain a valid state, the action_script value is passed to system() or eval() without sanitization, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.1.1sall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ASUS device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the exact model number (RP-AC52, EA-N66, RP-N12, RP-N14, RP-N53, RP-AC56, or WMP-N12)Affected if The device is any of these seven models: RP-AC52, EA-N66, RP-N12, RP-N14, RP-N53, RP-AC56, or WMP-N12
-
Check RP-AC52 firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the Administration or System section to view the firmware version. Alternatively, check the download page or release notes from ASUS support for the installed firmware build numberAffected if For RP-AC52: firmware version is 1.0.1.1s or earlier
-
Confirm all other models are affectedFor EA-N66, RP-N12, RP-N14, RP-N53, RP-AC56, or WMP-N12: verify the device is running any firmware version (no version check needed)Affected if For these six models: any firmware version at all
-
Verify web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the device HTTP/HTTPS web management interface from the network. Confirm the apply.cgi script exists by attempting to access http://[device-ip]/apply.cgiAffected if The web interface is reachable on the network (the vulnerability is in the apply.cgi script and requires the web server to be running)
If the device is an ASUS RP-AC52 with firmware <= 1.0.1.1s, or any other listed model (EA-N66, RP-N12, RP-N14, RP-N53, RP-AC56, WMP-N12) with any firmware version, and the web management interface is accessible, the device is affected by this command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware update if available; if no update exists due to end-of-life status, replace the device and implement network segmentation to isolate legacy embedded devices from critical infrastructure.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,760.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6558 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6558 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data