CVE-2016-6637
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 242; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.7, 3.x before 3.3.0.5, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4; UAA BOSH before 11.5 and 12.x before 12.5; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that approve or deny a scope via a profile or authorize approval page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple CSRF vulnerabilities in Pivotal Cloud Foundry's UAA (User Account and Authentication) component allow remote attackers to hijack victim authentication to approve or deny OAuth scopes via profile or authorization approval pages. The vulnerabilities affect UAA versions 2.x, 3.x, and 3.4.x, along with Elastic Runtime, Ops Manager, and related PCF components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.0<= 241= 1.6.0= 1.6.1= 1.6.2= 1.6.3= 1.6.4= 1.6.5= 1.6.6= 1.6.7= 1.6.8= 1.6.9= 1.6.10= 1.6.11= 1.7.0= 1.7.1= 1.7.2= 1.7.3= 1.7.4= 1.7.5= 1.7.6= 1.7.7= 1.7.8= 1.7.9= 1.7.10= 1.7.11= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.4.0= 2.5.1= 2.6.1= 2.7.0.2= 2.7.0.3= 2.7.1= 2.7.2= 2.7.3= 2.7.4.6= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify UAA component versionLocate the UAA version by querying the UAA API endpoint /uaa/info or checking the BOSH deployment manifest for the UAA release versionAffected if UAA version is 2.3.0 through 2.7.4.6, 3.0.0, or any 3.x or 3.4.x version below 3.4.4 (or below 3.3.0.5 for 3.3.x branches)
-
Identify Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime versionCheck the Elastic Runtime product version in the Ops Manager tile configuration or via the cf CLI command 'cf curl /v2/info' to retrieve the API version informationAffected if Elastic Runtime version is 1.6.0 through 1.6.11 inclusive
-
Identify Ops Manager versionCheck the Ops Manager web UI dashboard for the installed version or query the Ops Manager API endpoint /api/installationAffected if Ops Manager version is 1.7.0 through 1.7.11 inclusive
-
Verify anti-CSRF token presence on OAuth approval endpointsInspect the HTML source of the OAuth authorization approval page (typically at /oauth/authorize) and profile approval page to confirm that a unique, server-generated token is included as a hidden form field or header for all state-changing operationsAffected if The approval forms lack anti-CSRF tokens (such as state parameter validation or unique per-request tokens) on the scope approval actions
You are affected if your UAA version falls within 2.x, 3.x, or 3.4.x (below 3.4.4), your Elastic Runtime is 1.6.x, or your Ops Manager is 1.7.x, and the OAuth approval pages do not implement anti-CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade UAA to version 2.7.4.7+, 3.3.0.5+, or 3.4.4+ and Elastic Runtime/Ops Manager to patched versions per the advisory. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing operations in the authorization flow.
UAA: 2.7.4.7+/3.3.0.5+/3.4.4+; UAA BOSH: 11.5+/12.5+; Elastic Runtime: 1.6.40+/1.7.21+/1.8.2+; Ops Manager: 1.7.13+/1.8.1+; PCF: 242+
- Upgrade Cloud Foundry UAA to version 2.7.4.7 or later for 2.x releases, 3.3.0.5 or later for 3.3.x, or 3.4.4 or later for 3.4.x
- Upgrade Cloud Foundry UAA BOSH to version 11.5 or later for 11.x, or 12.5 or later for 12.x
- Upgrade Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime to version 1.6.40 or later for 1.6.x, 1.7.21 or later for 1.7.x, or 1.8.2 or later for 1.8.x
- Upgrade Cloud Foundry Ops Manager to version 1.7.13 or later for 1.7.x or 1.8.1 or later for 1.8.x
- Upgrade overall Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) to version 242 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6637 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6637 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data