CVE-2016-6783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn elevation of privilege vulnerability in the MediaTek driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as High because it first requires compromising a privileged process. Product: Android. Versions: N/A. Android ID: A-31350044. References: MT-ALPS02943437.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceElevation of privilege vulnerability in a MediaTek kernel driver allows a local malicious application that has already compromised a privileged process to execute arbitrary code within kernel context, achieving full system compromise. The vulnerability resides in the MediaTek-specific driver code within the Android kernel and requires the attacker to have high-privilege access first, which elevates the CVSS complexity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SoC/hardware vendorCheck /proc/cpuinfo or use 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep Hardware' to determine if the device uses a MediaTek (MTK) chipsetAffected if The device uses MediaTek hardware; this vulnerability only exists in MediaTek-specific kernel drivers
-
Confirm Android OS versionCheck the Android version via Settings > About Phone > Android version, or use 'getprop ro.build.version.release'Affected if Android version is 7.1.0 or earlier; versions after 7.1.0 are not affected according to the affected product range
-
Locate the MediaTek kernel driverSearch for MediaTek driver files in /proc/modules, /sys/module/, or /vendor/lib/modules/ using 'lsmod' or 'find / -name *mediatek* -o -name *mtk*' (requires root)Affected if A MediaTek-specific kernel driver module is loaded or present on the device; the vulnerability resides in this vendor-specific code
-
Check kernel version and build dateUse 'uname -a' or 'cat /proc/version' to view the kernel build information; cross-reference with the December 2016 Android security patch dateAffected if The kernel was built before December 2016 and contains the unpatched MediaTek driver code
-
Inspect driver permissions and SELinux contextIf the MediaTek driver module is found, check its file permissions and SELinux context via 'ls -la /sys/module/<driver_name>' or 'ls -Z /vendor/lib/modules/' (requires root)Affected if The driver is accessible to privileged processes, which is the attack surface for this elevation-of-privilege flaw
A user is affected if the device runs Android 7.1.0 or earlier, uses MediaTek hardware, and contains the vulnerable MediaTek kernel driver built before the December 2016 patch cycle.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Android security patches from the December 2016 bulletin or later, as this vulnerability was addressed in that cycle. Device users should obtain system updates from their manufacturers; for custom ROMs or embedded devices, rebuild with the patched MediaTek driver provided by the vendor.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data