CVE-2016-7194
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Chakra JavaScript engine in Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-3386, CVE-2016-3389, and CVE-2016-7190.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in the Chakra JavaScript engine in Microsoft Edge allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service via a crafted website. The vulnerability stems from improper memory handling during JavaScript execution, enabling attackers to corrupt memory and potentially achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Microsoft Edge is installedSearch for MicrosoftEdge.exe in C:\Windows\SystemApps\ or check Start menu for Microsoft EdgeAffected if Microsoft Edge executable is found on the system
-
Check if JavaScript execution is enabled in EdgeOpen Edge, go to Settings > Advanced settings, verify 'JavaScript' is set to Allow (enabled by default)Affected if JavaScript is enabled in Edge settings (this is the default and required for the exploit to trigger)
-
Verify security update MS16-119 is installedOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features > View installed updates, or run 'wmic qfe list' command, search for KB3198585 or KB3198223 (MS16-119)Affected if Security update MS16-119 (or a subsequent cumulative update containing the fix) is NOT installed
-
Check Windows build number for update statusRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /C:"Build"' - Windows 10 builds prior to 14393 (Redstone 1) are unpatchedAffected if Windows 10 build number is below 14393 AND no standalone MS16-119 update is installed
User is affected if Microsoft Edge is installed with JavaScript enabled AND the system lacks the MS16-119 security update (KB3198585/KB3198223) or a later cumulative update addressing this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Microsoft security update (MS16-119 or subsequent cumulative update) to all affected Windows systems running Microsoft Edge. Until patched, restrict or disable JavaScript execution in Edge and warn users against visiting untrusted websites.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-7194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-7194 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data