OfficeApplication · Microsoft

CVE-2016-7275

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-12-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, 2013 SP1, 2013 RT SP1, and 2016 mishandles library loading, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Microsoft Office OLE DLL Side Loading Vulnerability."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a DLL side-loading vulnerability in Microsoft Office's OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) component where the application loads dynamic link libraries from insecure locations. A local attacker can place a malicious DLL in a location where Office will load it, achieving privilege escalation to execute code with elevated privileges.

MitigationApply the Microsoft security updates for this CVE. Additionally, implement secure DLL search order settings and ensure Office applications only load DLLs from trusted, protected directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OfficeApplication
Affected:= 2010= 2013= 2016

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Microsoft Office version
    Open Command Prompt and run: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\ClickToRun\Configuration' /v Version. For Office 2010/2013/2016, also check: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\[version]\Common\InstallRoot' where [version] is 14.0 (2010), 15.0 (2013), or 16.0 (2016)
    Affected if The installed version is 2010, 2013, or 2016 as listed in the affected versions
  2. Verify OLE component is present
    Check for the presence of OLE automation files: dir /s C:\Windows\System32\ole*.dll or verify the OLE32.DLL exists in System32
    Affected if The OLE component DLLs exist in the Office or System32 directory, which is required for the vulnerability to be triggerable
  3. Check DLL search order configuration
    Run: reg query 'HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\SafeDllSearchMode' to check if safe DLL search is enabled. Value 1 = safe search enabled, 0 = disabled
    Affected if SafeDllSearchMode is set to 0 (disabled), indicating insecure DLL loading paths may be used
  4. Inspect Office DLL loading behavior
    Use Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) to capture Office application startup and filter for DLL load operations, checking if DLLs are loaded from user-writable directories like the application directory or temp folders
    Affected if Office applications load DLLs from locations outside protected system directories

If Office version 2010, 2013, or 2016 is installed and OLE components are present with unsafe DLL search order settings or observed DLL loads from insecure paths, the environment is likely affected by this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Microsoft security updates for this CVE. Additionally, implement secure DLL search order settings and ensure Office applications only load DLLs from trusted, protected directories.

Fix this in Office Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-7275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-7275 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data