TcpdumpApplication

CVE-2016-7935

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-01-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.8.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The RTP parser in tcpdump before 4.9.0 has a buffer overflow in print-udp.c:rtp_print().

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol) parser within tcpdump versions before 4.9.0, specifically in the print-udp.c file's rtp_print() function. The vulnerability can be triggered by processing specially crafted RTP packets, potentially allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade tcpdump to version 4.9.0 or later to obtain the patched version. Until then, avoid processing untrusted network traffic with tcpdump and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TcpdumpApplication
Affected:<= 4.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if tcpdump is installed
    Run 'which tcpdump' or 'command -v tcpdump' to verify the binary exists on the system
    Affected if tcpdump is not installed, the system is not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Determine the installed tcpdump version
    Run 'tcpdump --version' and examine the output for the version number (e.g., tcpdump version 4.8.1)
    Affected if The version number is 4.8.1 or lower, placing it within the affected range (≤4.8.1)
  3. Identify if tcpdump is being used to capture network traffic
    Review running processes or cron jobs that execute tcpdump, or check for active packet capture sessions using 'ps aux | grep tcpdump'
    Affected if tcpdump is actively capturing packets, the system could be affected when processing RTP traffic
  4. Verify if RTP traffic may be present on monitored network segments
    Inspect tcpdump capture filters or capture files for RTP packet indicators (typically UDP port 5004/5005 or RTP-specific headers); check if the -v, -vv, or -vvv verbose flags are used which enable RTP parsing output
    Affected if RTP traffic is being parsed or could be captured, and tcpdump version is ≤4.8.1, the system is vulnerable to the buffer overflow

A system is affected if tcpdump version 4.8.1 or lower is installed and is actively processing or could process RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol) network packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.8.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade tcpdump to version 4.9.0 or later to obtain the patched version. Until then, avoid processing untrusted network traffic with tcpdump and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Recommended fix High confidence

tcpdump 4.9.0 or later

  1. Check current tcpdump version: tcpdump --version
  2. Upgrade tcpdump to version 4.9.0 or later using your system package manager (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get install tcpdump for Debian/Ubuntu, yum update tcpdump for RHEL/CentOS, or emerge --update net-analyzer/tcpdump for Gentoo)
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version: tcpdump --version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Tcpdump Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-7935 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-7935 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data