FedoraOperating system · Fedoraproject

CVE-2016-7948

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-12-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
X.org libXrandr before 1.5.1 allows remote X servers to trigger out-of-bounds write operations by leveraging mishandling of reply data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in libXrandr (versions before 1.5.1) where improper handling of reply data from remote X servers allows out-of-bounds memory writes, potentially enabling remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade libXrandr to version 1.5.1 or later. Additionally, restrict X server network exposure and enforce authentication (e.g., xhost+, IP-based access controls) to minimize attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 24= 25
LibxrandrApplication
Affected:<= 1.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed libXrandr version
    Run 'rpm -q libXrandr' on Fedora or check the library file version with 'objdump -p /usr/lib/libXrandr.so* | grep VERSION' or 'ldd --version'. Compare the output to the affected range (versions <= 1.5.0).
    Affected if The installed version is 1.5.0 or earlier.
  2. Confirm X11 display server is running
    Check if an X server is active by running 'ps aux | grep X' or checking for open ports with 'ss -tlnp | grep :6000' (default X11 port).
    Affected if An X server process is running and listening for connections.
  3. Check X server network exposure
    Inspect network configuration for X display listeners. Run 'xdpyinfo -display :0' locally to verify display works, then check if the system accepts remote connections by reviewing 'xauth list' or examining /etc/X11/xorg.conf for 'DisableTCP' settings. The vulnerability is triggered by reply data from remote X servers.
    Affected if The X server is configured to accept remote TCP connections (not using Unix socket only).

A system is affected if it has libXrandr version 1.5.0 or earlier AND runs an X server accessible to remote clients over the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade libXrandr to version 1.5.1 or later. Additionally, restrict X server network exposure and enforce authentication (e.g., xhost+, IP-based access controls) to minimize attack surface.

Recommended fix High confidence

libxrandr 1.5.1 or later; Fedora 24/25 users should upgrade to a supported Fedora release

  1. Identify the current version of libxrandr installed (e.g., via rpm -qa libXrandr or dpkg -l libxrandr)
  2. Update the system package manager to fetch the latest available packages
  3. Upgrade libxrandr to version 1.5.1 or later by running the appropriate package manager upgrade command (e.g., dnf update libXrandr or apt-get update && apt-get upgrade libxrandr)
  4. Restart any X.org server or X-dependent applications to ensure the patched library is loaded
  5. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds 1.5.1 using the version check command from step 1
Caveat Upgrading libxrandr may require updating related X.org libraries to maintain compatibility; Fedora 24/25 are end-of-life and users should migrate to a supported Fedora version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fedora Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-7948 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-7948 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data