Email GatewayApplication · Mcafee

CVE-2016-8005

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-03-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.6.401 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
File extension filtering vulnerability in Intel Security McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) before 7.6.404h1128596 allows attackers to fail to identify the file name properly via scanning an email with a forged attached filename that uses a null byte within the filename extension.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A null byte injection vulnerability in McAfee Email Gateway allows attackers to bypass file extension filtering by embedding a null byte within the filename extension of email attachments. The scanning engine processes only the portion of the filename before the null byte, causing it to misidentify the file type (e.g., treating an executable as a benign file based on a fake extension before the null byte).

MitigationUpgrade McAfee Email Gateway to version 7.6.404h1128596 or later, which includes proper null byte handling in filename parsing. As a compensating control, enable file content-based analysis (e.g., magic byte inspection) rather than relying solely on filename extensions for attachment filtering.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Email GatewayApplication
Affected:<= 7.6.401

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed McAfee Email Gateway version
    Access the appliance management console or check the product version through the system information panel. The version is typically displayed on the main dashboard or in the 'About' section of the administration interface.
    Affected if The installed version is 7.6.401 or any version lower than 7.6.401.
  2. Confirm attachment filtering is active
    Review the email gateway's attachment filtering policies in the administration console. Look for rules that filter or block attachments based on file extensions (e.g., .exe, .bat, .scr).
    Affected if Extension-based attachment filtering rules are configured and active.
  3. Check if content-based file analysis is disabled
    Examine the attachment scanning configuration to determine whether file content analysis (magic byte/header inspection) is enabled. This is typically found in the advanced scanning settings or content filter configuration.
    Affected if Content-based file type analysis is disabled or not configured, meaning the system relies solely on filename extensions for file type identification.
  4. Verify null byte handling in filename parsing
    If available, review scanning engine logs or configuration for any null byte filtering or sanitization settings. Test with a benign file containing a null byte in the extension to observe how the engine processes it.
    Affected if The scanning engine does not strip or properly handle null bytes in filenames, allowing the portion after the null byte to be processed differently than the portion before.

You are affected if your McAfee Email Gateway version is 7.6.401 or earlier and attachment filtering relies on filename extensions without content-based analysis enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.6.401
Interim mitigation

Upgrade McAfee Email Gateway to version 7.6.404h1128596 or later, which includes proper null byte handling in filename parsing. As a compensating control, enable file content-based analysis (e.g., magic byte inspection) rather than relying solely on filename extensions for attachment filtering.

Fix this in Email Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-8005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-8005 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data