CVE-2016-8341
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Ecava IntegraXor Version 5.0.413.0. The Ecava IntegraXor web server has parameters that are vulnerable to SQL injection. If the queries are not sanitized, the host's database could be subject to read, write, and delete commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceEcava IntegraXor Version 5.0.413.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in its web server parameters. Attackers can exploit unsanitized user inputs to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially allowing unauthorized read, write, and delete operations on the connected database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0.413.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed IntegraXor versionCheck the application version through the IntegraXor application itself, its installation directory, or the Windows Programs and Features listAffected if The version displayed is exactly 5.0.413.0
-
Confirm the web server component is enabledLocate the IntegraXor web server configuration and verify it is actively running and accessible on its configured port (typically port 80 or 8080)Affected if The web server component is running and accepting HTTP/HTTPS connections
-
Review web server access logs for SQL injection patternsExamine IntegraXor web server logs for unusual query strings containing SQL keywords (such as UNION, SELECT, DROP, INSERT, or single quotes) in URL parametersAffected if Log entries show unexpected SQL syntax or injection attempts in request parameters
-
Check for unauthorized database modificationsInspect the connected database for unexpected schema changes, new tables, or modified records that were not part of normal operationsAffected if Database contains unauthorized tables, records, or altered data that cannot be attributed to legitimate applications
You are affected if IntegraXor version 5.0.413.0 is installed and its web server component is accessible, as this specific version contains the SQL injection flaw in unsanitized web server parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available patches from Ecava; if no patch exists, implement strict input validation and parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions to neutralize SQL injection vectors.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-8341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-8341 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data