Unity ProApplication · Schneider Electric

CVE-2016-8354

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-02-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 11.0 or later.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Unity PRO prior to V11.1. Unity projects can be compiled as x86 instructions and loaded onto the PLC Simulator delivered with Unity PRO. These x86 instructions are subsequently executed directly by the simulator. A specially crafted patched Unity project file can make the simulator execute malicious code by redirecting the control flow of these instructions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in Schneider Electric Unity PRO PLC Simulator allows arbitrary code execution through crafted x86 instructions in patched Unity project files. The simulator executes x86 instructions directly without proper validation, enabling an attacker to redirect control flow and execute malicious code by modifying the compiled Unity project.

MitigationUpdate Unity PRO to V11.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, implement file integrity verification and only load Unity project files from trusted, validated sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unity ProApplication
Affected:<= 11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Unity PRO version
    Locate the installed Unity PRO application and check its version information through the application menu (Help > About) or the installer/program files metadata. Compare the version number to the affected range (11.0 and earlier).
    Affected if The installed version is 11.0 or lower.
  2. Confirm PLC Simulator is in use
    Verify whether the Unity PRO installation includes the PLC Simulator component and whether it is actively used for testing or development. This can be confirmed by checking for simulator-specific project configurations or runtime settings within Unity PRO.
    Affected if The PLC Simulator component is installed and being used to load or simulate project files.
  3. Inspect loaded Unity project files
    Review the Unity project files (.apx, .xef, or related compiled project formats) currently loaded in the simulator. Check file properties and verify the source of these files, noting any recent modifications or imports from external or untrusted sources.
    Affected if Project files from untrusted or unknown sources have been loaded into the simulator, or files show signs of unexpected modification.
  4. Check for unexpected execution behavior
    Monitor the PLC Simulator for any unusual execution patterns, unexpected code execution, or anomalous behavior that could indicate control flow redirection. Review any logs or output generated during simulation.
    Affected if The simulator exhibits unexpected execution or behavior consistent with injected malicious code.

You are affected if Unity PRO version 11.0 or earlier is installed, the PLC Simulator is being used, and project files from untrusted sources have been loaded, creating conditions for arbitrary code execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 11.0
Interim mitigation

Update Unity PRO to V11.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, implement file integrity verification and only load Unity project files from trusted, validated sources.

Fix this in Unity Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,300
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-8354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-8354 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data