CVE-2016-8365
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOSIsoft PI System software (Applications using PI Asset Framework (AF) Client versions prior to PI AF Client 2016, Version 2.8.0; Applications using PI Software Development Kit (SDK) versions prior to PI SDK 2016, Version 1.4.6; PI Buffer Subsystem, versions prior to and including, Version 4.4; and PI Data Archive versions prior to PI Data Archive 2015, Version 3.4.395.64) operates between endpoints without a complete model of endpoint features potentially causing the product to perform actions based on this incomplete model, which could result in a denial of service. OSIsoft reports that in order to exploit the vulnerability an attacker would need to be locally connected to a server. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe PI System software components (AF Client, PI SDK, PI Buffer Subsystem, PI Data Archive) operate between endpoints without properly modeling endpoint capabilities. This incomplete model of endpoint features can cause the product to perform incorrect actions leading to a denial of service condition. The vulnerability requires local access to the server for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.8.0< 4.5.0< 3.4.400.1162< 1.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PI System componentsEnumerate the OSIsoft PI System components present on the machine. Common locations include C:\Program Files\OSIsoft\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\OSIsoft\. Look for subdirectories corresponding to AF Client, PI SDK, PI Buffer Subsystem, and PI Data Archive.Affected if Any of the four affected components (AF Client, PI SDK, PI Buffer Subsystem, PI Data Archive) are found on the system
-
Check PI AF Client versionLocate the PI AF Client installation and retrieve its version information, typically found in the assembly metadata, product information file, or via the program properties in Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 2.8.0
-
Check PI SDK versionLocate the PI SDK installation and retrieve its version information, typically found in the assembly metadata, product information file, or via the program properties in Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 1.4.6
-
Check PI Buffer Subsystem versionLocate the PI Buffer Subsystem installation and retrieve its version information, typically found in the assembly metadata, product information file, or via the program properties in Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 4.5.0
-
Check PI Data Archive versionLocate the PI Data Archive installation and retrieve its version information, typically found in the assembly metadata, product information file, or via the program properties in Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 3.4.400.1162
The environment is affected if any of the four PI System components (AF Client, PI SDK, PI Buffer Subsystem, or PI Data Archive) are installed at a version below the thresholds (2.8.0, 1.4.6, 4.5.0, and 3.4.400.1162 respectively).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.4.62.8.03.4.400.1162
Update affected components to the specified versions: PI AF Client 2016 v2.8.0 or later, PI SDK 2016 v1.4.6 or later, PI Buffer Subsystem v4.4.1 or later, and PI Data Archive 2015 v3.4.395.64 or later. Since the attack requires local access, ensure servers are in secured physical locations with restricted access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-8365 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-8365 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data