CVE-2016-9334
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Rockwell Automation Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 controller 1763-L16AWA, Series A and B, Version 14.000 and prior versions; 1763-L16BBB, Series A and B, Version 14.000 and prior versions; 1763-L16BWA, Series A and B, Version 14.000 and prior versions; and 1763-L16DWD, Series A and B, Version 14.000 and prior versions. User credentials are sent to the web server in clear text, which may allow an attacker to discover the credentials if they are able to observe traffic between the web browser and the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 PLC controllers (versions 14.000 and prior) transmit web interface credentials in cleartext over HTTP, enabling network eavesdropping attackers to capture valid user credentials by observing unencrypted browser-to-server traffic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000<= 14.000CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelLocate the Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 controller on the network or physically inspect the unit label. Confirm the model number matches one of the affected variants: 1763 L16awa, 1763 L16bbb, 1763 L16bwa, or 1763 L16dwd (Series A or Series B).Affected if The device model is any of the eight affected product numbers listed in the affected products range.
-
Check firmware versionAccess the device web interface or use RSLinx Classic software to query the device firmware version. Navigate to the controller properties or system information section to retrieve the firmware revision number.Affected if The installed firmware version is 14.000 or any earlier version.
-
Verify web server configurationLog into the device web interface and navigate to the web server settings or network configuration page. Check whether HTTP (port 80) is enabled and whether HTTPS/TLS (port 443) is available or enabled for the web interface.Affected if HTTP is enabled and HTTPS is disabled or unavailable on the controller.
-
Inspect network trafficUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the same network segment as the PLC. Log into the web interface and observe the HTTP traffic between the browser and the controller. Verify if the login credentials are transmitted as plaintext rather than encrypted.Affected if Login credentials are observable in cleartext within captured HTTP packets.
The device is affected if it is an Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 variant with firmware version 14.000 or lower, and the web interface is accessible via unencrypted HTTP with HTTPS either disabled or unavailable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable TLS/HTTPS on the web server configuration, or implement network segmentation and traffic monitoring to protect credentials in transit; if encryption is unsupported by the controller firmware, consider network isolation or alternative authentication methods.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9334 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data