A320 FirmwareOperating system · Marel

CVE-2016-9358

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Hard-Coded Passwords issue was discovered in Marel Food Processing Systems M3000 terminal associated with the following systems: A320, A325, A371, A520 Master, A520 Slave, A530, A542, A571, Check Bin Grader, FlowlineQC T376, IPM3 Dual Cam v132, IPM3 Dual Cam v139, IPM3 Single Cam v132, P520, P574, SensorX13 QC flow line, SensorX23 QC Master, SensorX23 QC Slave, Speed Batcher, T374, T377, V36, V36B, and V36C; M3210 terminal associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; M3000 desktop software associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; MAC4 controller associated with the same systems as the M3000 terminal identified above; SensorX23 X-ray machine; SensorX25 X-ray machine; and MWS2 weighing system. The end user does not have the ability to change system passwords.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Hard-coded passwords embedded in Marel food processing systems (M3000, M3210 terminals, MAC4 controllers, SensorX23/25 X-ray machines, MWS2 weighing system, and multiple related systems) grant unauthorized access to attackers. The critical severity stems from the inability for end users to change these passwords, leaving the credential exposure unmitigatable by operators.

MitigationContact Marel for firmware/Software updates that address the hard-coded credentials; implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure until vendor remediation is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
A320 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A325 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A371 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A520 Master FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A520 Slave FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A530 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A542 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
A571 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Marel product model and firmware version
    Access the system interface, check system information screens, or review system logs/firmware banners to determine the exact product model (M3000, M3210, MAC4, SensorX23, SensorX25, MWS2, or related) and firmware version
    Affected if The product is any of the listed affected models (M3000, M3210, MAC4, SensorX23/25, MWS2, or related systems) with any firmware version listed (A320, A325, A371, A520 Master/Slave, A530, A542, A571)
  2. Examine configuration files for embedded passwords
    Review system configuration files, backup archives, exported system configurations, or any stored credential files for hardcoded password strings
    Affected if Hardcoded passwords are found embedded in configuration files, backups, or system exports
  3. Check network accessibility of management interfaces
    Scan network boundaries to determine if the Marel system management ports are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
    Affected if The system management interface is directly accessible from the internet or untrusted networks without segmentation

If the product is a Marel system (M3000, M3210, MAC4, SensorX23/25, MWS2, or related) with any of the affected firmware versions AND credentials or management interfaces are exposed to unauthorized users, the environment is affected by this hardcoded credential vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Contact Marel for firmware/Software updates that address the hard-coded credentials; implement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure until vendor remediation is available.

Fix this in A320 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation12.0 h
  • Implementation40.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
76.0 hours of engineering $13,440
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $21,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9358 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data