CVE-2016-9361
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Moxa NPort 5110 versions prior to 2.6, NPort 5130/5150 Series versions prior to 3.6, NPort 5200 Series versions prior to 2.8, NPort 5400 Series versions prior to 3.11, NPort 5600 Series versions prior to 3.7, NPort 5100A Series & NPort P5150A versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5200A Series versions prior to 1.3, NPort 5150AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5250AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5450AI-M12 Series versions prior to 1.2, NPort 5600-8-DT Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 5600-8-DTL Series versions prior to 2.4, NPort 6x50 Series versions prior to 1.13.11, NPort IA5450A versions prior to v1.4. Administration passwords can be retried without authenticating.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NPort device firmware allows unlimited password retry attempts without any rate limiting, authentication requirement, or account lockout. This enables unauthenticated attackers to conduct brute-force attacks against administrative passwords over the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.5<= 3.5<= 2.7<= 3.10<= 3.6<= 1.2<= 1.2<= 1.2<= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck the device label, web interface header, or SNMP sysDescr for 'NPort' and the specific series number (5100, 5200, 5400, 5600, 5100a, P5150a, 5200a, or 5x50a1 M12)Affected if The device is a Moxa NPort series not listed in the affected products section or is a different manufacturer entirely
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the web-based management interface and navigate to the System Settings or Operations section to view the firmware version. Alternatively, use the console CLI command 'show firmware' or query via SNMP OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.8691.7.128Affected if Unable to retrieve firmware version or the device does not support firmware version reporting
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesMatch your installed firmware version to the following affected ranges: NPort 5100 <= 2.5 or <= 3.5; NPort 5200 <= 2.7; NPort 5400 <= 3.10; NPort 5600 <= 3.6; NPort 5100a <= 1.2; NPort P5150a <= 1.2; NPort 5200a <= 1.2; NPort 5x50a1 M12 <= 1.1Affected if The installed firmware version falls within or below any of these affected version thresholds
-
Verify network exposure of management interfaceCheck firewall rules, VLAN configuration, or access control lists to determine if the NPort web management port (typically 80/443) or Telnet/SSH management ports are accessible from untrusted network segments or the internetAffected if Management interfaces are reachable from networks outside your trusted administrative zone
A user is affected if they have a Moxa NPort device from the listed series running firmware at or below the specified version thresholds, and that management interface is accessible from a network where unauthenticated attackers could attempt unlimited password guesses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected NPort device firmware to the patched versions specified (2.6, 3.6, 2.8, 3.11, 3.7, 1.3, 1.2, 2.4, 1.13.11, v1.4 depending on series). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to management interfaces via firewall or VLAN segmentation.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed version for your model: NPort 5110 to v2.6+, NPort 5130/5150 to v3.6+, NPort 5200 to v2.8+, NPort 5400 to v3.11+, NPort 5600 to v3.7+, NPort 5100A/P5150A to v1.3+, NPort 5200A to v1.3+, NPort 5x50AI-M12 series to v1.2+, NPort 5600-8-DT/DTL to v2.4+, NPort 6x50 to v1.13.1
- 1. Identify the specific NPort model (e.g., NPort 5110, NPort 5200, etc.) from the device label or web interface
- 2. Check the current firmware version via the device's web console or admin interface
- 3. Download the latest firmware from the official Moxa website (www.moxa.com) matching your specific model
- 4. Back up the current device configuration through the web interface before upgrading
- 5. Upload and apply the firmware update via the device's admin interface, following Moxa's upgrade instructions
- 6. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed
- 7. Restore the configuration backup if needed
- 8. Confirm the web interface now properly enforces authentication on password retry attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9361 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9361 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data