CVE-2016-9774
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe postinst script in the tomcat6 package before 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u4 on Debian wheezy, before 6.0.35-1ubuntu3.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS; the tomcat7 package before 7.0.28-4+deb7u8 on Debian wheezy, before 7.0.56-3+deb8u6 on Debian jessie, before 7.0.52-1ubuntu0.8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 16.10; and the tomcat8 package before 8.0.14-1+deb8u5 on Debian jessie, before 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, before 8.0.37-1ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu 16.10, and before 8.0.38-2ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 17.04 might allow local users with access to the tomcat account to obtain sensitive information or gain root privileges via a symlink attack on the Catalina localhost directory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe postinst script in multiple Debian and Ubuntu Tomcat packages (6, 7, and 8) contains a symlink attack vulnerability in the Catalina localhost directory handling. Local users with access to the tomcat account can exploit this to read sensitive files or escalate privileges to root by creating malicious symlinks during or after package installation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 16.10= 6.0= 7.0= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Tomcat package versionRun 'dpkg -l | grep tomcat' (Debian/Ubuntu) or check /usr/share/tomcat*/etc/tomcat*.json or /etc/tomcat* tomcat-version filesAffected if The installed version matches the vulnerable releases: tomcat6 versions before 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u4, tomcat7 versions before 7.0.28-4+deb7u8 (Debian 7) or 7.0.56-3+deb8u6 (Debian 8) or 7.0.72-1ubuntu1.3 (Ubuntu), tomcat8 versions before 8.0.14-1+deb8u5 (Debian 8) or 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3 (Ubuntu)
-
Locate the Catalina localhost directoryFind the Catalina base (typically /var/lib/tomcat*/ or /var/lib/tomcat*) and check for the 'conf/Catalina/localhost' directoryAffected if The Catalina localhost directory exists and is writable by the tomcat user or tomcat group, allowing symlink creation
-
Inspect for suspicious symlinks in localhost directoryRun 'ls -la <catalina_base>/conf/Catalina/localhost/' and look for symlinks pointing outside the webapp directories or to sensitive system filesAffected if Any symlinks exist in the localhost directory that point to locations outside the expected webapp deployment area, especially to /etc/, /root/, or other sensitive directories
-
Check ownership and permissions on Catalina directoriesRun 'ls -la <catalina_base>/conf/Catalina/' and verify the owner and permissions on the localhost subdirectoryAffected if The tomcat user or any unprivileged local user has write access to create symlinks in the Catalina localhost directory
-
Audit recent file creation in Catalina directoryRun 'find <catalina_base>/conf/Catalina/ -type l -mtime -30' (or adjust timeframe) to find recently created symlinksAffected if Symlinks were created recently in the Catalina directory, indicating potential exploitation activity
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Tomcat package version (pre-patch) AND the tomcat user or local attackers have write access to the Catalina localhost directory where malicious symlinks could be created.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the patched Tomcat package versions (tomcat6 6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u4+, tomcat7 7.0.28-4+deb7u8+/7.0.56-3+deb8u6+, tomcat8 8.0.14-1+deb8u5+/8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3+). Alternatively, audit existing Catalina localhost directory permissions and remove any suspicious symlinks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9774 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9774 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data