Gemfire For Pivotal Cloud FoundryApplication · Pivotal Software

CVE-2016-9880

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-03-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.6.5 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The GemFire broker for Cloud Foundry 1.6.x before 1.6.5 and 1.7.x before 1.7.1 has multiple API endpoints which do not require authentication and could be used to gain access to the cluster managed by the broker.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The GemFire broker for Cloud Foundry versions 1.6.x before 1.6.5 and 1.7.x before 1.7.1 contains multiple API endpoints that lack authentication controls, allowing unauthenticated attackers to potentially access and control the managed GemFire cluster.

MitigationUpgrade the GemFire broker to version 1.6.5, 1.7.1, or later to implement proper authentication on all API endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Gemfire For Pivotal Cloud FoundryApplication
Affected:>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.5= 1.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the GemFire broker version in Ops Manager
    In the Pivotal Operations Manager UI, navigate to the 'Pivotal GemFire' tile and locate the version number displayed on the tile information panel
    Affected if The displayed version is 1.6.0 through 1.6.4, or exactly 1.7.0
  2. Check the product installation manifest
    If you have access to the installation files, open the stemcell or product metadata JSON file for GemFire for PCF and locate the 'product_version' field
    Affected if The version field shows 1.6.0-1.6.4 or 1.7.0
  3. Query the Cloud Foundry API for service broker version
    Run 'cf service-brokers' to list service brokers, then inspect metadata for the gemfire broker using 'cf service-broker gemfire' or check the API response from /v2/service_brokers
    Affected if The returned version matches 1.6.0-1.6.4 or 1.7.0
  4. Review installation receipts or logs
    Check Ops Manager installation logs or the /var/tempest/workspaces/default/tenants/*/installations directory for GemFire installation receipt files that contain version strings
    Affected if The receipt shows version 1.6.0-1.6.4 or 1.7.0

You are affected if the GemFire for PCF tile version is 1.6.0 through 1.6.4 or exactly 1.7.0, as these versions contain API endpoints without authentication controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.6.5 or later
Fixed in 1.6.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the GemFire broker to version 1.6.5, 1.7.1, or later to implement proper authentication on all API endpoints.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to GemFire for Pivotal Cloud Foundry 1.6.5 (for 1.6.x users) or 1.7.1 (for 1.7.x users)

  1. Identify the current GemFire for Pivotal Cloud Foundry version deployed in your environment
  2. If running 1.6.x (1.6.0 through 1.6.4), plan upgrade to version 1.6.5
  3. If running 1.7.0, plan upgrade to version 1.7.1
  4. Review Pivotal documentation for GemFire for PCF upgrade procedures
  5. Backup all existing GemFire broker configurations and cluster data
  6. Execute the upgrade to the appropriate fixed version (1.6.5 or 1.7.1)
  7. After upgrade, verify that all API endpoints now require authentication

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Gemfire For Pivotal Cloud Foundry Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9880 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data