CVE-2016-9966
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLack of appropriate exception handling in some receivers of the Telecom application on Samsung Note devices with L(5.0/5.1), M(6.0), and N(7.0) software allows attackers to crash the system easily resulting in a possible DoS attack, or possibly gain privileges. The Samsung ID is SVE-2016-7120.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVulnerability in Samsung's Telecom application on Note devices running Android 5.0-7.0 (L/M/N). The issue is lack of proper exception handling in BroadcastReceivers, allowing attackers to send crafted intents that either crash the system (DoS) or potentially escalate privileges. The receivers fail to catch and handle exceptions properly, leading to system-wide instability or unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.1= 6.0= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device manufacturer is SamsungCheck the device settings or run 'getprop ro.product.manufacturer' or 'getprop ro.brand' in adb shell to verify the device is made by SamsungAffected if Device is not a Samsung device, then not affected by this specific Samsung vulnerability
-
Check Android OS versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in adb shellAffected if Version is 5.0, 5.1, 6.0, or 7.0 - falls within the affected range; versions 8.0 and above are not affected
-
Verify Samsung Telecom application is presentCheck for com.android.phone or Samsung Telecom component using 'pm list packages' or 'dumpsys package' in adb shell, or look for Telecom app in app settingsAffected if The Telecom application is installed and active on the device; if absent, the specific vulnerability does not apply
-
Confirm device is a Galaxy Note modelCheck the model number via Settings > About Phone > Model number, or run 'getprop ro.product.model' in adb shell - the CVE specifically targets Note devicesAffected if Device is a Galaxy Note running the affected Android versions; other Samsung devices may have different exposure
-
Check if Samsung security patch SVE-2016-7120 is appliedReview the Samsung security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Software information > Security patch level, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' in adb shellAffected if Patch level is earlier than the SVE-2016-7120 fix date; devices without this specific Samsung update remain vulnerable
User is affected if running a Samsung Galaxy Note device with Android 5.0-7.0 that has not received the SVE-2016-7120 security update - the combination of Samsung hardware, vulnerable Android versions, and unpatched Telecom component creates the exposure window.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Samsung security updates that address SVE-2016-7120. For legacy devices no longer receiving updates, consider network-based controls to block malicious intent broadcasts targeting the Telecom component, or retire affected devices.
Android 8.0 (Oreo) or later with December 2016 security patch level; for affected models, seek the latest Samsung software update containing the SVE-2016-7120 fix
- 1. Check if your Samsung device model supports newer Android versions (8.0+) or the December 2016 security patch level or later
- 2. Navigate to Settings > About Phone on the Samsung device
- 3. Check the Android security patch level under About Phone > Software information
- 4. If the security patch level is earlier than December 2016, contact your carrier or Samsung for available updates
- 5. If an update is available, back up important data before applying
- 6. Apply the latest available Samsung security update or system update
- 7. After updating, verify the security patch level now shows December 2016 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9966 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9966 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data