CVE-2017-0261
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Office 2010 SP2, Office 2013 SP1, and Office 2016 allow a remote code execution vulnerability when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0262 and CVE-2017-0281.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, 2013 SP1, and 2016 that allows remote code execution when the software fails to properly handle objects in memory, typically triggered by opening specially crafted Office documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2010= 2013= 2016CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Microsoft Office versionOpen any Office application (Word, Excel, PowerPoint), go to File > Account > About [App] or check Programs and Features for Microsoft Office. The version number appears in the format YY.MMM (e.g., 16.0.xxxx for Office 2016).Affected if The version displayed is 2010, 2013, or 2016 with no security updates applied.
-
Verify Office service pack levelFor Office 2010, verify SP2 is installed via File > Help in any Office app (shows 'Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010 SP2'). For Office 2013, verify SP1 is installed via the same method. For Office 2016, check the build number in File > Account > About [App].Affected if Office 2010 is at SP2, Office 2013 is at SP1, or Office 2016 has a build number before the security patch was released (May 2017).
-
Check Windows Update history for Office security patchesOpen Windows Update (Windows Key + R, type 'ms-settings:windowsupdate'), view update history, and look for security updates installed in May 2017 or later related to Microsoft Office (KB numbers such as KB3191823 for Office 2016, KB3191822 for Office 2013, KB3191824 for Office 2010).Affected if No relevant Office security patch from May 2017 or later appears in the update history.
-
Inspect Office file handling behaviorWhen opening Office documents (especially .doc, .docx, .rtf, .ppt, .pptx from untrusted sources), monitor for unexpected application crashes, abnormal memory usage spikes, or spawning of suspicious child processes (check via Task Manager during document open).Affected if The system exhibits crash behavior or anomalous process spawning when opening specially crafted Office documents, indicating exploitation of the memory corruption flaw.
You are affected if any Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, 2013 SP1, or 2016 installation lacks the May 2017 security update and processes untrusted Office documents without protective controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates for affected Office versions and instruct users to avoid opening untrusted or unexpected Office documents from untrusted sources.
- Open Microsoft Update or Windows Update to check for available updates
- Locate the security update for Microsoft Office that addresses CVE-2017-0261
- Alternatively, manually download the specific security update from the Microsoft Update Catalog for your Office version: KB (security update) from the month of the fix
- Install the security update and restart the computer if prompted
- Verify the update was installed successfully via Office application or Windows Update history
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-0261 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-0261 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data