CVE-2017-0477
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote code execution vulnerability in libgdx could enable an attacker using a specially crafted file to execute arbitrary code within the context of an unprivileged process. This issue is rated as High due to the possibility of remote code execution in an application that uses this library. Product: Android. Versions: 7.1.1. Android ID: A-33621647.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability in libgdx (a cross-platform game development framework) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by tricking users into opening specially crafted files. The vulnerability resides in how libgdx processes certain file types, enabling code execution within the context of the unprivileged application using the library.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.1.0= 7.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if your Android application uses libgdxInspect the application's build configuration files (build.gradle, pom.xml, or similar) for libgdx dependencies. Also check the libs/ or app/libs/ directories for gdx.jar or similar libgdx library files.Affected if libgdx library is included in the application dependencies or project files
-
Determine the installed libgdx versionCheck the version string in the libgdx JAR file (typically in the filename like gdx-1.9.x.jar) or in the build configuration file's dependency declaration. You can also decompile the APK and inspect the classes in the com.badlogic.gdx package for version information.Affected if The libgdx version matches or falls within the vulnerable version range for this CVE
-
Verify the application runs on affected Android versionsCheck the application's target SDK and minimum SDK settings in AndroidManifest.xml or build.gradle. The vulnerability affects Android 7.0 (API 24), 7.1.0 (API 25), and 7.1.1 (API 25) when using the vulnerable libgdx version.Affected if The application targets or runs on Android 7.0, 7.1.0, or 7.1.1 with a vulnerable libgdx version in use
-
Confirm if the application processes external file typesReview the application's code for file loading functionality, particularly any handlers for file types that libgdx processes (such as images, audio, or custom asset files loaded from external sources). Check for uses of Gdx.files or AssetManager loading files from untrusted sources.Affected if The application loads file types processed by libgdx from external or untrusted sources
Your environment is affected if you have an Android application using a vulnerable libgdx version that processes file types from external sources, particularly when running on Android 7.0, 7.1.0, or 7.1.1.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate libgdx to the latest patched version in all Android applications that incorporate this library. Since this is a library vulnerability, any application using the affected libgdx version is vulnerable until the library is updated.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-0477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-0477 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data