Docker CommonsApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2017-1000094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDocker Commons Plugin provides a list of applicable credential IDs to allow users configuring a job to select the one they'd like to use to authenticate with a Docker Registry. This functionality did not check permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read permission to get a list of valid credentials IDs. Those could be used as part of an attack to capture the credentials using another vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Docker Commons Plugin exposed a list of valid Docker Registry credential IDs to any user with Overall/Read permission without verifying authorization. This allowed unauthorized enumeration of credential identifiers that could be leveraged in chained attacks to capture credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Docker CommonsApplication
<= 1.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Docker Commons Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins | grep dockerAffected if Docker Commons Plugin appears in the plugin list
-
Check installed version of Docker Commons PluginIn Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, find Docker Commons and note the version numberAffected if Version is 1.9 or lower (or any version if not patched)
-
Verify credential IDs are accessible to low-privilege usersCreate or use a test account with only Overall/Read permission (no Admin or Configure permissions), then attempt to access the Docker Commons API endpoint or check if credential IDs appear in job configurations visible to that userAffected if A user with only Overall/Read permission can view/list Docker registry credential IDs
-
Check for Docker registry credentials configured in JenkinsNavigate to Credentials > System > Global credentials, or use Jenkins API: /api/json?tree=credentials[id,typeName]Affected if Docker Registry credentials are present and the plugin is vulnerable
If the Docker Commons Plugin version is 1.9 or lower AND Docker registry credentials are configured, users with Overall/Read permission can enumerate credential IDs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Docker Commons Plugin to a version that implements proper permission checks before returning credential IDs, restricting access to authorized users only.
Fix this in Docker Commons
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1000094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1000094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data