NetbsdOperating system

CVE-2017-1000374

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-06-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw exists in NetBSD's implementation of the stack guard page that allows attackers to bypass it resulting in arbitrary code execution using certain setuid binaries. This affects NetBSD 7.1 and possibly earlier versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

NetBSD's stack guard page implementation contains a flaw that allows attackers to bypass this security mitigation, enabling arbitrary code execution through certain setuid binaries. This effectively defeats a fundamental memory protection mechanism designed to prevent stack-based buffer overflow exploits from gaining elevated privileges.

MitigationApply NetBSD security patches for version 7.1 and earlier; if no patch is available, consider disabling unnecessary setuid binaries or implementing additional runtime protections such as execshield or SEGNOP handling until a patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NetbsdOperating system
Affected:<= 7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm NetBSD is the running operating system
    Run 'uname -a' or check '/etc/os-release' to verify the OS is NetBSD
    Affected if The system is not running NetBSD (this CVE only affects NetBSD)
  2. Determine the installed NetBSD version
    Run 'uname -r' or check the kernel version to obtain the exact NetBSD release version
    Affected if The version is 7.1 or any earlier release (e.g., 7.0, 6.x, 5.x)
  3. Identify setuid binaries on the system
    Run 'find / -perm -4000 -type f 2>/dev/null' to list all setuid binaries
    Affected if Any setuid binaries exist and are executable by the user checking (the vulnerability allows privilege escalation through these)
  4. Verify stack guard page is in use
    Check kernel configuration or examine if stack protection is enabled via 'sysctl kern.stackgap' or similar sysctl values related to stack guard pages
    Affected if Stack guard pages are enabled (the vulnerability specifically bypasses this mitigation)

The system is affected if it runs NetBSD version 7.1 or earlier and has setuid binaries with stack guard page protection enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.1
Interim mitigation

Apply NetBSD security patches for version 7.1 and earlier; if no patch is available, consider disabling unnecessary setuid binaries or implementing additional runtime protections such as execshield or SEGNOP handling until a patch can be applied.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

NetBSD 7.2 or later (preferably NetBSD 8.x stable)

  1. 1. Backup all critical data and system configuration before proceeding
  2. 2. Download the latest NetBSD stable release (NetBSD 8.x or the latest 7.x stable branch after 7.1)
  3. 3. Review NetBSD upgrade documentation for your specific installation method
  4. 4. Upgrade the NetBSD system to the fixed release
  5. 5. Reboot the system to load the updated kernel with the stack guard page fix
  6. 6. Verify the system is running the updated kernel version
Caveat Review NetBSD release notes for any changes to setuid binary behavior or security defaults between your current version and the target version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Netbsd Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1000374 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1000374 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data