CVE-2017-10601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA specific device configuration can result in a commit failure condition. When this occurs, a user is logged in without being prompted for a password while trying to login through console, ssh, ftp, telnet or su, etc., This issue relies upon a device configuration precondition to occur. Typically, device configurations are the result of a trusted administrative change to the system's running configuration. The following error messages may be seen when this failure occurs: mgd: error: commit failed: (statements constraint check failed) Warning: Commit failed, activating partial configuration. Warning: Edit the router configuration to fix these errors. If the administrative changes are not made that result in such a failure, then this issue is not seen. No other Juniper Networks products or platforms are affected by this issue. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3 prior to 12.3R10, 12.3R11; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D20; 13.2 prior to 13.2R8; 13.3 prior to 13.3R7; 14.1 prior to 14.1R4-S12, 14.1R5, 14.1R6; 14.1X53 prior to 14.1X53-D30; 14.2 prior to 14.2R4; 15.1 prior to 15.1F2, 15.1F3, 15.1R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Junos OS, a specific device configuration that causes a commit failure (statements constraint check failed) can result in users being logged in without password authentication when accessing via console, ssh, ftp, telnet, or su. This creates an authentication bypass where partial configuration gets activated after the commit fails.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 12.3x48= 13.2= 13.3= 14.1= 14.1x53= 14.2= 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' command on the deviceAffected if The installed version matches 12.3, 12.3X48, 13.2, 13.3, 14.1, 14.1X53, 14.2, or 15.1 (or any version between these that is not patched)
-
Review system logs for commit failuresRun 'show log messages' or 'show system commit' and search for 'statements constraint check failed' or commit failure eventsAffected if Recent commit attempts show 'statements constraint check failed' errors indicating a configuration triggered the vulnerability condition
-
Check for unexpected console or mgmt accessRun 'show system users' or review authentication logs for sessions that occurred without password promptAffected if Users appear logged in via console, ssh, ftp, telnet, or su without corresponding successful authentication entries in the logs
-
Verify commit history for failed configurationsRun 'show system commit' and 'show system commit detail' to identify failed commit attempts and the associated configurationAffected if There are recent failed commits with partial configuration activation that could have left authentication in an unexpected state
The environment is affected if the Junos OS version is one of the affected versions listed AND there is evidence of a commit failure with 'statements constraint check failed' that may have resulted in unauthorized passwordless access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions (12.3R10+, 12.3X48-D20+, 13.2R8+, 13.3R7+, 14.1R4-S12+, 14.1X53-D30+, 14.2R4+, 15.1F2+/15.1F3+/15.1R2+) and review configurations for any that may cause commit failures.
Upgrade to Junos 12.3R10/R11, 12.3X48-D20, 13.2R8, or 13.3R7 (or later stable releases in each respective branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected device using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine which branch (12.3, 12.3X48, 13.2, or 13.3) the device is running
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release from the Juniper Networks download portal
- 4. For 12.3 branch devices: upgrade to 12.3R10 or 12.3R11
- 5. For 12.3X48 branch devices: upgrade to 12.3X48-D20 or later
- 6. For 13.2 branch devices: upgrade to 13.2R8 or later
- 7. For 13.3 branch devices: upgrade to 13.3R7 or later
- 8. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or USB
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-10601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-10601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data