CVE-2017-10872
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedH2O version 2.2.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in the server via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceH2O versions 2.2.3 and earlier contain a vulnerability allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to cause denial of service via unspecified vectors. The CVSS 6.5 indicates a network-exploitable DoS with low attack complexity and no user interaction required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify H2O is installedCheck for the H2O binary or service on the system. Common locations include /usr/sbin/h2o, /usr/bin/h2o, or check system services (systemctl list-units | grep h2o or ps aux | grep h2o).Affected if H2O server software is present on the system
-
Determine installed H2O versionRun 'h2o --version' or 'h2o -v' from the command line. If installed as a service, also check package manager listings (dpkg -l | grep h2o, rpm -qa | grep h2o, or brew list h2o).Affected if The version command fails or returns a version number
-
Compare version to affected rangeReview the version output against the affected range: versions 2.2.3 and earlier are vulnerable. Note that versions after 2.2.3 are fixed.Affected if The installed version is 2.2.3 or any earlier version (e.g., 2.2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.0, etc.)
-
Confirm H2O service is runningCheck if the H2O process is active: systemctl status h2o, service h2o status, or ps aux | grep h2o. The vulnerability is a DoS against a running server.Affected if H2O service is currently running and accepts network connections
A system is affected if H2O server is installed and the running version is 2.2.3 or any earlier version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade H2O to a version newer than 2.2.3. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure compatibility with existing configurations and applications.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-10872 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-10872 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data