CVE-2017-11292
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Flash Player version 27.0.0.159 and earlier has a flawed bytecode verification procedure, which allows for an untrusted value to be used in the calculation of an array index. This can lead to type confusion, and successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Flash Player contains a flawed bytecode verification procedure that allows untrusted values to be used in array index calculations, leading to type confusion. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.0= 6.0<= 27.0.0.159<= 27.0.0.130<= 27.0.0.159CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Adobe Flash Player is installedCheck for the presence of Flash Player files: On Windows, look in C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash or browser plugin directories; On Linux, check /usr/lib/flash-plugin or ~/.mozilla/plugins; On macOS, check /Library/Internet Plug-InsAffected if Adobe Flash Player is found installed on the system
-
Identify the installed Flash Player versionWindows: Right-click npflash.dll or Flash32_xx_x_x_xxx.ocx and select Properties > Details to view the File Version; Linux: Run rpm -q flash-plugin or dpkg -l | grep flash; macOS: Right-click Flash Player in /Library/Internet Plug-Ins and select Get Info to see the versionAffected if The installed version cannot be determined or the file is not found
-
Compare the version against affected rangesCompare the identified version number to the affected ranges: Adobe Flash Player Desktop Runtime versions <= 27.0.0.159 and Adobe Flash Player versions <= 27.0.0.130 or <= 27.0.0.159 are vulnerableAffected if The installed version is 27.0.0.159 or earlier, or 27.0.0.130 or earlier (depending on the specific product line)
-
Check for Flash Player in web browsersOpen each installed browser and navigate to adobe.com/go/aboutflashplayer to view the installed version, or visit a version detection page like about:plugins (Firefox) or chrome://plugins (Chrome)Affected if Browser plugins show an older vulnerable Flash Player version active
A system is affected if Adobe Flash Player is installed with a version at or below 27.0.0.159 (Desktop Runtime) or at or below 27.0.0.130/27.0.0.159 (other editions).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Adobe Flash Player to a version later than 27.0.0.159, or preferably remove Flash Player entirely given its end-of-life status and replace with modern web technologies.
N/A - Adobe Flash Player reached End-of-Life on December 31, 2020. Upgrade to a supported solution (HTML5 video, native media players) or remove Flash entirely.
- Uninstall Adobe Flash Player from all affected systems using the operating system's package manager or the Adobe Flash Player uninstaller.
- For Enterprise Linux systems (Desktop, Server, Workstation 6.0), remove flash-plugin package via: yum remove flash-plugin or rpm -e flash-plugin
- Remove any remaining Flash Player browser plugins from all web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc.)
- Verify complete removal by checking that no Flash-related files remain in /usr/lib/flash-plugin, /usr/share/flash-plugin, or browser plugin directories
- Consider deploying Adobe's Flash Player End-of-Life removal tool if available for your platform
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-11292 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-11292 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data