CVE-2017-11589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn Cisco DDR2200 ADSL2+ Residential Gateway DDR2200B-NA-AnnexA-FCC-V00.00.03.45.4E and DDR2201v1 ADSL2+ Residential Gateway DDR2201v1-NA-AnnexA-FCC-V00.00.03.28.3 devices, there is no access control for info.html, wancfg.cmd, rtroutecfg.cmd, arpview.cmd, cpuview.cmd, memoryview.cmd, statswan.cmd, statsatm.cmd, scsrvcntr.cmd, scacccntr.cmd, logview.cmd, voicesipview.cmd, usbview.cmd, wlmacflt.cmd, wlwds.cmd, wlstationlist.cmd, HPNAShow.cmd, HPNAView.cmd, qoscls.cmd, qosqueue.cmd, portmap.cmd, scmacflt.cmd, scinflt.cmd, scoutflt.cmd, certlocal.cmd, or certca.cmd.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Cisco DDR2200 and DDR2201v1 ADSL2+ Residential Gateways contain a critical authorization bypass vulnerability where multiple administrative web pages (info.html, wancfg.cmd, rtroutecfg.cmd, and 25+ others) lack any access control checks. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to directly access sensitive management interfaces, potentially exposing system configuration, network statistics, WAN/ATM stats, QoS settings, firewall rules, certificate data, and voice/SIP settings without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= ddr2200b-na-annexa-fcc-v00.00.03.45.4e= ddr2201v1-na-annexa-fcc-v00.00.03.28.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the device's web interface or check the administrative console for the exact model number (DDR2200 or DDR2201v1) and firmware version string. Look for version strings such as 'ddr2200b-na-annexa-fcc-v00.00.03.45.4e' or 'ddr2201v1-na-annexa-fcc-v00.00.03.28.3'.Affected if The device is a Cisco DDR2200 or DDR2201v1 running either of the listed firmware versions.
-
Verify web management interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the device's HTTP interface via its LAN or WAN IP address on common ports (80, 443, 8080). Confirm the login page loads.Affected if The device's web management interface is reachable on the network.
-
Test unauthenticated access to info.htmlNavigate directly to 'http://<device_ip>/info.html' without providing any login credentials. Observe whether the page loads and displays system information.Affected if The page loads and displays sensitive system information without requiring authentication.
-
Test unauthenticated access to wancfg.cmdNavigate directly to 'http://<device_ip>/wancfg.cmd' without logging in. Check if WAN/ATM configuration settings are exposed.Affected if WAN configuration settings are visible without authentication.
-
Test unauthenticated access to rtroutecfg.cmdNavigate directly to 'http://<device_ip>/rtroutecfg.cmd' without logging in. Check if routing configuration is accessible.Affected if Routing configuration details are displayed without requiring login.
A user is affected if they have a Cisco DDR2200 or DDR2201v1 device running one of the listed firmware versions with its web management interface exposed, and any admin page loads without prompting for credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates when available. If no update exists, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the device's management interface from untrusted networks, or replace end-of-life devices with supported hardware.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-11589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-11589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data