LibtiffApplication

CVE-2017-11613

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-07-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In LibTIFF 4.0.8, there is a denial of service vulnerability in the TIFFOpen function. A crafted input will lead to a denial of service attack. During the TIFFOpen process, td_imagelength is not checked. The value of td_imagelength can be directly controlled by an input file. In the ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip function, the _TIFFCheckMalloc function is called based on td_imagelength. If we set the value of td_imagelength close to the amount of system memory, it will hang the system or trigger the OOM killer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In LibTIFF 4.0.8, the TIFFOpen function fails to validate the td_imagelength value from the input file before calling _TIFFCheckMalloc in ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip. An attacker can craft a TIFF file with an extremely large td_imagelength value to trigger unbounded memory allocation, causing denial of service via system hang or OOM killer activation.

MitigationImplement bounds checking on td_imagelength before memory allocation in ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip, and update to a patched version of LibTIFF that includes this validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibtiffApplication
Affected:= 4.0.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed LibTIFF version
    Run 'tiffinfo -version' or 'tiffcp -v' on the command line. On Linux you can also check the library file directly using 'strings' or checking package manager output like 'dpkg -l libtiff' or 'rpm -qa libtiff'. On Windows, check the file properties of the TIFF DLL in use.
    Affected if The version reported is exactly 4.0.8
  2. Identify applications using LibTIFF
    Search for binaries or applications linked against libtiff by running 'ldd' on suspect binaries or using 'ldconfig -p | grep tiff' to list linked libraries. Check if image viewers, converters, or document processors have LibTIFF dependencies.
    Affected if Any application that processes TIFF files is linked to LibTIFF version 4.0.8
  3. Determine if untrusted TIFF input is processed
    Review application logs or documentation to identify if the system accepts TIFF files from untrusted sources such as user uploads, email attachments, or network inputs. Check web servers, file upload handlers, or document management systems.
    Affected if Any application on the system accepts and processes TIFF files from untrusted or external sources
  4. Audit TIFF file processing workflows
    Look for automated scripts, batch jobs, or services that process TIFF files. Check cron jobs, application workflows, or file ingestion pipelines that handle image formats.
    Affected if Automated or user-initiated TIFF processing workflows exist on the system

You are affected if LibTIFF version 4.0.8 is installed AND any application or workflow on the system processes TIFF files from untrusted sources, as the vulnerability can be triggered by a specially crafted TIFF file.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement bounds checking on td_imagelength before memory allocation in ChopUpSingleUncompressedStrip, and update to a patched version of LibTIFF that includes this validation.

Fix this in Libtiff Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-11613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-11613 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data