Medhost Document Management SystemApplication · Medhost

CVE-2017-11694

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-07-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MEDHOST Document Management System contains hard-coded credentials that are used for Apache Solr access. An attacker with knowledge of the hard-coded credentials and the ability to communicate directly with Apache Solr may be able to obtain or modify sensitive patient and financial information. The Apache Solr account name is dms. The password is hard-coded throughout the application, and is the same across all installations. Customers do not have the option to change passwords. The dms account for Apache Solr has access to all indexed patient documents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

MEDHOST Document Management System contains a hard-coded Apache Solr account (username: dms) with a static password identical across all installations. This default credential provides direct access to all indexed patient documents containing sensitive health and financial information. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely by anyone who can reach the Solr service.

MitigationImplement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict direct access to Apache Solr from untrusted networks. Contact MEDHOST for an official patch that enables password customization. Monitor for unauthorized access to Solr endpoints while awaiting vendor remediation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Medhost Document Management SystemApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MEDHOST DMS installation
    Search for Medhost Document Management System installation directories, services, or processes on the system. Look for process names related to MEDHOST or DMS.
    Affected if MEDHOST Document Management System is present on the system
  2. Locate Apache Solr service
    Check for running Solr processes or services, typically listening on port 8983. Use netstat or similar tools to identify listening services.
    Affected if Apache Solr is running as part of the MEDHOST DMS installation
  3. Verify Solr network accessibility
    Determine if the Solr service is bound to network interfaces accessible from non-localhost addresses. Check firewall rules and service binding configuration.
    Affected if Solr is accessible from network addresses other than localhost or trusted internal networks
  4. Test default credential
    Attempt to authenticate to the Solr admin interface using username 'dms' with its default password. This can be done via HTTP basic authentication to the Solr endpoint.
    Affected if Authentication with username 'dms' and the static default password succeeds, confirming the hardcoded credential is active

A user is affected if MEDHOST Document Management System is installed, the embedded Apache Solr is network-accessible, and the default credential (username: dms) successfully authenticates, exposing patient documents.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict direct access to Apache Solr from untrusted networks. Contact MEDHOST for an official patch that enables password customization. Monitor for unauthorized access to Solr endpoints while awaiting vendor remediation.

Fix this in Medhost Document Management System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,940
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-11694 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-11694 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data