CVE-2017-12235
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the implementation of the PROFINET Discovery and Configuration Protocol (PN-DCP) for Cisco IOS 12.2 through 15.6 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to the improper parsing of ingress PN-DCP Identify Request packets destined to an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted PN-DCP Identify Request packet to an affected device and then continuing to send normal PN-DCP Identify Request packets to the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability affects Cisco devices that are configured to process PROFINET messages. Beginning with Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(52)SE, PROFINET is enabled by default on all the base switch module and expansion-unit Ethernet ports. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz47179.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS PROFINET Discovery and Configuration Protocol (PN-DCP) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause device reloads. The flaw is in improper parsing of ingress PN-DCP Identify Request packets; exploitation requires sending a crafted packet followed by normal PN-DCP Identify Request packets, triggering a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.2, <= 15.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device and IOS versionRun 'show version' on the device to obtain the Cisco IOS version numberAffected if The IOS version falls between 12.2 and 15.6 inclusive (for example, 15.2(4)E, 15.5(3)T, etc.)
-
Confirm PN-DCP protocol is presentRun 'show inventory' or 'show module' to see if the device supports PROFINET capabilities; check if PN-DCP related features appear in the IOS feature setAffected if The device IOS image includes PROFINET/PROFINET DCP support
-
Check for active PN-DCP configurationRun 'show running-config | include profinet' or 'show profinet status' (if available on the device) to see if PROFINET is configuredAffected if PN-DCP is enabled or configured on any interface or globally on the device
-
Identify interfaces with PROFINET settingsRun 'show running-config' and search for 'profinet' or 'pn-dcp' keywords in the interface configurationsAffected if Any interface has PROFINET or PN-DCP settings applied (for example, 'profinet enable' or 'profinet id' on an interface)
-
Verify PN-DCP Identify Request processing is activeCheck if the device responds to PROFINET discovery requests; use 'show profinet statistics' or 'show profinet interface' if supportedAffected if The device has PN-DCP processing active and would respond to Identify Request packets
The device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS versions 12.2 through 15.6, has PROFINET/PN-DCP enabled, and has PN-DCP configuration present on interfaces or globally.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available Cisco IOS security updates or patches for this vulnerability. If updates are unavailable, consider disabling PROFINET on unaffected ports or implementing network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12235 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data