CVE-2017-12251
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web console of the Cisco Cloud Services Platform (CSP) 2100 could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to interact maliciously with the services or virtual machines (VMs) operating remotely on an affected CSP device. The vulnerability is due to weaknesses in the generation of certain authentication mechanisms in the URL of the web console. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to one of the hosted VMs' URLs in Cisco CSP and viewing specific patterns that control the web application's mechanisms for authentication control. An exploit could allow the attacker to access a specific VM on the CSP, which causes a complete loss of the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This vulnerability affects Cisco Cloud Services Platform (CSP) 2100 running software release 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, or 2.2.2. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve64690.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the web console of Cisco Cloud Services Platform (CSP) 2100 allows an authenticated, remote attacker to access hosted VMs by exploiting weaknesses in the URL-based authentication mechanism. The attacker browses to VM URLs and views specific patterns that control the application's authentication controls, achieving complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability on affected VMs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.2.0= 2.2.1= 2.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco CSP 2100 deploymentLocate any Cisco Cloud Services Platform 2100 appliances in your inventory or network. Check device hostnames, management interfaces, or documentation for this specific model.Affected if Cisco CSP 2100 hardware or virtual appliance is present in the environment
-
Determine installed software versionAccess the CSP 2100 CLI or web console and run 'show version' or check the system information page to retrieve the exact software version number.Affected if Installed version matches 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, or 2.2.2
-
Verify web console is accessibleCheck if the CSP 2100 web console interface (HTTPS on port 443 or configured port) is reachable from network segments. Use 'show http server' or review firewall policies.Affected if Web console is enabled and exposed to network traffic
-
Review access logs for VM URL patternsExamine CSP 2100 web console logs for requests to VM-specific URLs that may indicate unauthorized access attempts. Look for direct VM console or VNC URL patterns.Affected if Logs show VM access from unauthenticated or unauthorized user sessions
-
Check for unauthorized VM sessionsUse 'show vm sessions' or equivalent command on CSP 2100 to list active or recent VM console sessions and verify they were initiated by legitimate administrators.Affected if Active VM sessions exist that were not initiated by known administrators
Your environment is affected if you have a Cisco CSP 2100 running versions 2.1.0 through 2.2.2 with the web console accessible to network users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco CSP 2100 to a fixed software release beyond version 2.2.2. If upgrade is not immediately feasible, restrict web console access to trusted administrators only and monitor for unauthorized VM access attempts.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12251 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data