CVE-2017-12298
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meeting Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of some parameters that are passed to the web server of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a user to follow a malicious link or by intercepting a user request and injecting malicious code into the request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected web interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf78615, CSCvf78628.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meeting Center caused by insufficient input validation of parameters passed to the web server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject malicious script code into requests that get executed in the context of the affected user's web interface, potentially allowing access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco WebEx Meeting Center deploymentIdentify whether your organization uses Cisco WebEx Meeting Center for web conferencing. Check installed packages, hosted services, or vendor contracts for WebEx Meeting Center. Look for meeting center URLs (typically at webex.com/yourcompany/meetingcenter or similar paths).Affected if Your environment hosts or uses Cisco WebEx Meeting Center web interface.
-
Identify the WebEx Meeting Center web interfaceLocate the web server hosting WebEx Meeting Center. This is typically accessible via HTTPS on your organization's WebEx subdomain. Verify the service is running by accessing the meeting center login or meeting page.Affected if The Cisco WebEx Meeting Center web interface is accessible and responds to requests.
-
Review web server access logs for XSS attemptsExamine HTTP access logs on the WebEx Meeting Center web server for unusual characters in request parameters. Look for patterns like <script>, javascript:, onerror=, or other HTML/script tags in query strings, POST bodies, or headers.Affected if Malicious script injection patterns appear in web logs, indicating active exploitation attempts.
-
Test for reflected XSS via parameter injectionSubmit a harmless test payload (such as a simple alphanumeric string like 'TEST123') to web application parameters and verify the response reflects this input verbatim without encoding. Then test with basic XSS probe strings in different parameter values.Affected if User-supplied input is reflected in the response without proper encoding or validation, indicating the input validation flaw exists.
If Cisco WebEx Meeting Center is deployed and its web interface is accessible, the environment is affected since all versions of this product contain the XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco's available patch for CSCvf78615/CSCvf78628. Until patch is applied, implement input validation and output encoding on affected parameters, and consider WAF rules to detect and block XSS attack patterns.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12298 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12298 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data