CVE-2017-12319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) over an Ethernet Virtual Private Network (EVPN) for Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition, or potentially corrupt the BGP routing table, which could result in network instability. The vulnerability exists due to changes in the implementation of the BGP MPLS-Based Ethernet VPN RFC (RFC 7432) draft between IOS XE software releases. When the BGP Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route or BGP EVPN MAC/IP Advertisement Route update packet is received, it could be possible that the IP address length field is miscalculated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted BGP packet to an affected device after the BGP session was established. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload or corrupt the BGP routing table; either outcome would result in a DoS. The vulnerability may be triggered when the router receives a crafted BGP message from a peer on an existing BGP session. This vulnerability affects all releases of Cisco IOS XE Software prior to software release 16.3 that support BGP EVPN configurations. If the device is not configured for EVPN, it is not vulnerable. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCui67191, CSCvg52875.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE Software's BGP EVPN implementation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause device reload or corrupt the BGP routing table by sending crafted BGP packets with miscalculated IP address length fields in Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route or MAC/IP Advertisement Route updates. The vulnerability only affects devices with BGP EVPN configured and exists due to implementation changes in the RFC 7432 draft between software releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.4\(1\)s< 16.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS XE versionRun 'show version' command and locate the version number in the output (typically displayed as 16.X.Y or similar)Affected if The version is less than 16.3 (for example, 16.2.x, 16.1.x, or any earlier release)
-
Verify BGP EVPN is configuredRun 'show running-config | include evpn' or 'show running-config | section router bgp' and look for 'evpn' configuration under the BGP router sectionAffected if BGP EVPN is configured and active on the device (presence of 'address-family l2vpn evpn' or 'evpn' commands under router bgp)
-
Confirm BGP neighbor sessions are establishedRun 'show bgp l2vpn evpn summary' to check if any EVPN neighbors are configured and the BGP session is establishedAffected if There are active BGP EVPN peers, as the attack vector requires sending crafted packets to these EVPN neighbors
The device is affected only if it runs Cisco IOS XE version below 16.3 AND has BGP EVPN configured with active neighbors, as the vulnerability requires both the vulnerable code path and the feature to be enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.3
Upgrade to Cisco IOS XE Software release 16.3 or later; if upgrade is not immediately possible, verify that BGP EVPN is not configured on affected devices to eliminate the attack vector.
Cisco IOS XE 16.3 or later
- Check if the device is configured for BGP EVPN using 'show running-config | include evpn' or 'show ip bgp vpnv4 all' - if not configured for EVPN, the device is not vulnerable
- Identify the current Cisco IOS XE Software version using 'show version'
- Upgrade Cisco IOS XE Software to version 16.3 or later to remediate this vulnerability
- After upgrade, verify BGP EVPN functionality is operational using 'show bgp evpn summary'
- Monitor device stability and BGP routing table integrity
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data