CVE-2017-12354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not sufficiently protect system software version information when the software responds to HTTP requests that are sent to the web-based interface of the software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to the web-based interface of the affected software. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information about the software, which the attacker could use to conduct additional reconnaissance attacks. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf66155.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn information disclosure vulnerability in Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) web interface allows unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain sensitive software version information through crafted HTTP requests. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not sufficiently protect system version information when responding to HTTP requests, exposing details that could aid further reconnaissance attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.8\(0.32\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco ACS web interface is exposedCheck network listening ports and firewall rules to determine if the ACS web interface (typically ports 80, 443, or 8443) is accessible from untrusted networks. Use 'netstat -an' or firewall inspection to list accessible services.Affected if The ACS web interface is accessible from untrusted network segments without authentication barriers.
-
Determine the installed Cisco ACS versionAccess the ACS administrative interface or check the system using the ACS administration console. The version is typically visible in the web interface login page or in the 'System Administration > Operations' section of the ACS GUI.Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.8(0.32).
-
Test for version information disclosure via HTTPSend a crafted HTTP request to the ACS web interface endpoint. For example, use 'curl -v http://<acs-host>/' or similar requests to observe the HTTP response headers and body for version information disclosure.Affected if The HTTP response reveals detailed Cisco ACS version information (such as 5.8(0.32)) without requiring authentication.
-
Verify if web interface requires authenticationAttempt to access the ACS web interface URL without providing credentials. Observe whether version details or system information is returned before any login prompt appears.Affected if Version or system information is displayed to unauthenticated users before any login credential is requested.
If Cisco ACS version 5.8(0.32) is running and its web interface is accessible from an untrusted network, and the HTTP response discloses version information without authentication, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for CSCvf66155 when available. In the interim, restrict network access to the ACS web-based management interface using firewalls or ACLs, and consider disabling the web interface if not required for operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data