CVE-2017-12423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allows remote authenticated users to read data on other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allows an authenticated user on one Storage Virtual Machine (SVM) to read data belonging to other SVMs, representing a cross-tenant information disclosure due to insufficient SVM isolation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.3= 8.3.1= 8.3.2= 8.3.2p11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Clustered Data ONTAP versionRun the 'version' command or use 'system node image' to display the current ONTAP software versionAffected if The version displayed is 8.3, 8.3.1, 8.3.2, or 8.3.2P11 (any version before 8.3.2P12)
-
Confirm multiple Storage Virtual Machines existUse the 'vserver show' command to list all SVMs configured in the clusterAffected if More than one SVM is configured, creating a multi-tenant environment where tenant isolation is relevant
-
Review SVM access controls and data access policiesExamine SVM-level access configurations using 'vserver export-policy' and 'vserver cifs share' commands to inspect how data access is restricted between SVMsAffected if Policies allow cross-SVM data access or lack proper tenant isolation rules
You are affected if your Clustered Data ONTAP version is between 8.3 and 8.3.2P11 inclusive and you have multiple SVMs configured where insufficient isolation may permit cross-tenant data reads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.2P12 or later. Review SVM access controls and data access policies to ensure proper tenant isolation is enforced.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data