Portable RuntimeApplication · Apache

CVE-2017-12613

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-10-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
When apr_time_exp*() or apr_os_exp_time*() functions are invoked with an invalid month field value in Apache Portable Runtime APR 1.6.2 and prior, out of bounds memory may be accessed in converting this value to an apr_time_exp_t value, potentially revealing the contents of a different static heap value or resulting in program termination, and may represent an information disclosure or denial of service vulnerability to applications which call these APR functions with unvalidated external input.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Out-of-bounds memory access vulnerability in Apache Portable Runtime (APR) versions 1.6.2 and prior. The apr_time_exp*() and apr_os_exp_time*() functions do not validate the month field value, allowing an attacker to pass an invalid month value that causes the functions to read outside intended memory bounds, potentially leaking heap contents (information disclosure) or causing program termination (DoS).

MitigationAdd input validation to ensure the month field value is within valid range (1-12) before calling apr_time_exp*() or apr_os_exp_time*() functions, or upgrade to a patched version of APR.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Portable RuntimeApplication
Affected:< 1.7.0
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 7.0= 9.0
Jboss Core ServicesApplication
Affected:all versions= 1.0
Jboss Enterprise Web ServerApplication
Affected:= 3.0.0
Software CollectionsApplication
Affected:= 1.0
Enterprise Linux DesktopOperating system
Affected:= 6.0= 7.0
Enterprise Linux EusOperating system
Affected:= 6.7= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 7.6= 7.7
Enterprise Linux ServerOperating system
Affected:= 6.0= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Portable Runtime installation
    Run 'apr-config --version' or 'pkg-config --modversion apr-1' to find the installed APR version. On Windows, check the file version of 'libapr-1.dll' in the APR installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.6.2 or prior, or the version cannot be determined but is reported as vulnerable by your package manager.
  2. Check application dependencies for APR
    Use 'ldd <executable>' on Linux or examine the application's dependency list to confirm it links to the vulnerable APR library.
    Affected if The application depends on a vulnerable version of libapr-1.so or libapr-1.dll.
  3. Audit code for vulnerable function usage
    Search source code for calls to apr_time_exp_gmt(), apr_time_exp_lt(), apr_time_exp(), or their apr_os_exp_time*() variants. Review the code paths that populate the month field (tm_mon) before these calls.
    Affected if The code passes user-controlled or unvalidated input to the month field of these functions without range checking.
  4. Inspect binary for function calls
    Use 'objdump -T <binary> | grep apr_time_exp' or 'nm <binary> | grep apr_time_exp' to list references to the vulnerable functions in compiled binaries.
    Affected if The binary links to and calls apr_time_exp*() functions without evidence of month field validation in surrounding code.

You are affected if your system has Apache Portable Runtime version 1.6.2 or earlier AND your applications use the apr_time_exp*() or apr_os_exp_time*() functions with unvalidated month field input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.7.0 or later
Fixed in 1.7.0
Interim mitigation

Add input validation to ensure the month field value is within valid range (1-12) before calling apr_time_exp*() or apr_os_exp_time*() functions, or upgrade to a patched version of APR.

Fix this in Portable Runtime Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12613 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data