Elastic Storage ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2017-1304

MEDIUM · 6.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-06-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM has identified a vulnerability with IBM Spectrum Scale/GPFS utilized on the Elastic Storage Server (ESS)/GPFS Storage Server (GSS) during testing of an unsupported configuration, where users applications are running on an active ESS I/O server node and utilize direct I/O to perform a read or a write to a Spectrum Scale file. This vulnerability may result in the use of an incorrect memory address, leading to a Spectrum Scale/GPFS daemon failure with a Signal 11, and possibly leading to denial of service or undetected data corruption. IBM X-Force ID: 125458.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Spectrum Scale/GPFS on Elastic Storage Server contains a memory addressing flaw when user applications run on an active ESS I/O server node and perform direct I/O operations to Spectrum Scale files. This causes incorrect memory address usage, leading to GPFS daemon crashes with Signal 11 and potential denial of service or undetected data corruption.

MitigationThis vulnerability only occurs in an explicitly unsupported configuration—avoid running user applications on active ESS I/O server nodes and instead use supported deployment architectures per IBM's documentation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Elastic Storage ServerApplication
Affected:= 2.0.0= 2.5.0= 2.5.5= 3.0.0= 3.0.5= 3.5.0= 3.5.6= 4.0.0= 4.0.6= 4.5.0= 4.6.0= 5.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Elastic Storage Server installation
    Locate and query the ESS system using IBM management commands (e.g., 'lsenfs' or 'mmlscluster' for Spectrum Scale/GPFS cluster information) to confirm the product is present
    Affected if The system is running IBM Elastic Storage Server
  2. Check installed ESS version
    Run IBM Spectrum Scale commands to retrieve the version (e.g., 'mmgetversion' or check /usr/lpp/-spectrum_scale for version files) and compare against the affected list: 2.0.0, 2.5.0, 2.5.5, 3.0.0, 3.0.5, 3.5.0, 3.5.6, 4.0.0, 4.0.6, 4.5.0, 4.6.0, 5.0.0
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions listed
  3. Determine if user applications run on ESS I/O server nodes
    Review deployment architecture and identify any user applications or workloads executing on active ESS I/O server nodes in the cluster
    Affected if User applications are running on active ESS I/O server nodes
  4. Check for direct I/O operations to Spectrum Scale files
    Monitor or audit application I/O patterns for direct I/O usage (O_DIRECT flag) against GPFS-mounted file systems on the ESS
    Affected if Applications perform direct I/O operations to Spectrum Scale files on the ESS

The environment is affected if IBM Elastic Storage Server is running a listed affected version AND user applications are executing on active ESS I/O server nodes AND those applications perform direct I/O operations to Spectrum Scale files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This vulnerability only occurs in an explicitly unsupported configuration—avoid running user applications on active ESS I/O server nodes and instead use supported deployment architectures per IBM's documentation.

Fix this in Elastic Storage Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-1304 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-1304 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data