Zktime WebApplication · Zkteco

CVE-2017-13129

HIGH · 8.0 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-09-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZKTeco ZKTime Web 2.0.1.12280 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrators by leveraging lack of anti-CSRF tokens.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZKTeco ZKTime Web 2.0.1.12280 allows remote authenticated users to hijack administrator authentication for requests that add new administrators, due to missing anti-CSRF tokens on the administrative add-user functionality.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) for all state-changing administrative actions, particularly the add administrator function, and validate these tokens on the server side.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zktime WebApplication
Affected:= 2.0.1.12280

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed ZKTime Web version
    Locate the ZKTeco ZKTime Web application and determine its software version. This may be found in the web interface about page, in application files, or by consulting the system administrator documentation.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.0.1.12280.
  2. Confirm access to the administrative interface
    Log into the ZKTime Web administrative interface with valid credentials. The vulnerability requires an authenticated session to exploit the CSRF flaw.
    Affected if You have administrative authentication to the ZKTime Web application.
  3. Inspect the add administrator form for anti-CSRF protection
    Navigate to the administrative user creation page (typically found in user management or administrator settings). View the HTML source code or intercept the HTTP request when the form loads. Look for a hidden input field containing a token value, or check request headers for a CSRF token parameter.
    Affected if The add administrator form submits requests without including any anti-CSRF token parameter or header.
  4. Test the add administrator endpoint for CSRF vulnerability
    With an authenticated administrative session, craft a cross-site request to the add administrator endpoint using a tool like Burp Suite or curl. Submit the request from an external context (different origin) without the token to see if the action succeeds.
    Affected if The add administrator action succeeds without requiring a valid anti-CSRF token, indicating the protection is missing.

You are affected if you are running ZKTeco ZKTime Web version 2.0.1.12280 AND the add administrator functionality lacks anti-CSRF token validation, allowing unauthorized administrative accounts to be created from cross-site requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) for all state-changing administrative actions, particularly the add administrator function, and validate these tokens on the server side.

Fix this in Zktime Web Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-13129 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-13129 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data