CVE-2017-13217
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn DisplayFtmItem in the bootloader, there is an out-of-bounds write due to reading a string without verifying that it's null-terminated. This could lead to a secure boot bypass and a local elevation of privilege enabling code execution as a privileged process with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android. Versions: Android kernel. Android ID: A-68269077.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in the DisplayFtmItem function within the Android bootloader. The vulnerability stems from reading a string into a fixed-length buffer without first verifying the string is properly null-terminated, causing data to overflow beyond the intended buffer boundary. This out-of-bounds write corrupts memory and can bypass secure boot verification, allowing arbitrary code execution at a privileged (bootloader) level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and OEMNote the device manufacturer, model number, and carrier (if applicable). This information is needed to determine the specific bootloader update availability from the OEM.Affected if The device is a Google Android device that has not received a specific bootloader security update addressing CVE-2017-13217 from its OEM.
-
Check bootloader versionBoot into the device bootloader (typically by holding volume down + power during boot) and note the bootloader version displayed. Alternatively, check via fastboot: 'fastboot getvar all' or 'fastboot oem device-info'. Look for a version string (e.g., 'bootloader-xxxx-xx').Affected if The bootloader version shown is earlier than the version that includes the CVE-2017-13217 patch, or the version string cannot be verified as patched.
-
Verify Android security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Software Information (or Security status) and check the 'Android security patch level' date. Compare this to the month the CVE was addressed in the Android Security Bulletin.Affected if The Android security patch level predates the CVE-2017-13217 patch release (patched in Android security bulletin around early 2018).
-
Check for secure boot statusInspect the bootloader or recovery to determine if verified boot (dm-verity / verified boot) is enabled and not in a warning state. On supported devices, 'fastboot oem device-info' may show 'Bootloader locked' status.Affected if Secure boot verification can be bypassed due to this vulnerability if the device bootloader has not been patched, regardless of lock status.
A user is affected if the device runs an unpatched Android bootloader where the DisplayFtmItem function lacks proper null-termination bounds checking, typically indicated by a pre-patch bootloader version or outdated security patch level.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis is a firmware-level vulnerability requiring a bootloader update from the device OEM that includes the patched DisplayFtmItem function with proper null-termination bounds checking. Users should apply available security patches and avoid rooting or modifying devices that could disable secure boot protections.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,384.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-13217 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-13217 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data